New Energy Levels for Degenerate Perturbation Theory

ma18
Messages
93
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



The e-states of H^0 are

phi_1 = (1, 0, 0) , phi_2 = (0,1,0), phi_3 = (0,0,1) *all columns
with e-values E_1, E_2 and E_3 respectively.

Each are subject to the perturbation

H' = beta (0 1 0
1 0 1
0 1 0)

where beta is a positive constant

a) If E_1 =/ E_2 =/ E_3

What are the new energy levels according to first and second-order perturbation theory

b) If E_1 = E_2 = E_3

What are the new energy levels according to first degenerate perturbation theory

c) If E_1 =/ E_2 = E_3

What are the new energy levels according to first perturbation theory

Homework Equations



For first order non degenerate perturbation:

E_n ^1 = <phi_n ^ 0 | H' | phi_n ^ 0>

For second order perturbation

E_n ^2 = Σ (m=/n) of (|phi_m ^0 | H' | phi_n ^ 0>|^2)/(E_n ^ 0 - E_m ^0)

The Attempt at a Solution



a)

E_1 ^1 = < (1 | H' | (1 >
0 0
0) 0)

I am not sure how to deal with this as I just get zeroAny help pushing me in the right direction would be appreciated
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Getting a zero only means that the first order correction to the energy vanishes. You should comtinue with the eigenstate perturbation and the second order energy correction.
 
Ok, thanks I have figured out a) but am still have trouble with the degenerate case
 
Can you show what you have attempted for the degenerate case?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top