New limit on lorentz invariance violation

connor415
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Seasons greetings all,

I am trying to dissect a really interesting article:

http://www.nature.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/nature/journal/v462/n7271/full/nature08574.html

but I am struggling with some of the more technical terms in it. I have shown it to some lecturers at my uni and even they are confused.

For example, what is the MQGn?

Its called the quantum gravity mass.

All i could find on it is that it is a parameter used to scale dispersion.

I am also struggling to understand exactly what is the result of the experiment. Its says it places a new lower limit on linear energy dependence at 1.2EPlanck, so does that mean that it was higher or lower before? Can they only test LIV time delays down to 1.2EPlanck?

Arggghhhhh :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh right thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top