I New paper gravitomagnetism explains dark matter effects

kodama
Messages
1,075
Reaction score
144
TL;DR Summary
Models of galactic rotation curves built of a general relativistic framework could use gravitomagnetism to explain the effects of dark matter
I'm not sure if this paper belongs in GR or astrophysics but

This articleG. O. Ludwig (2021), Galactic Rotation Curve and Dark Matter According to Gravitomagnetism, European Physical Journal C 81:186, DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08967-3

there's no need for dark matter,as GR's Gravitomagnetism could explain galaxy rotation effects, similar in spirit to MOND, but using just plain GR.

could GR experts weigh in on this
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
The basic idea of gravitomagnetic effects is valid; GR does predict them. The question is whether the paper's estimate of their magnitude for a rotating disk-shaped galaxy is correct. I think it will take some time for other researchers to check the work.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and vanhees71
PeterDonis said:
The basic idea of gravitomagnetic effects is valid; GR does predict them. The question is whether the paper's estimate of their magnitude for a rotating disk-shaped galaxy is correct. I think it will take some time for other researchers to check the work.

is gravitomagnetic effects always attractive like gravity, and therefore add up?
 
kodama said:
is gravitomagnetic effects always attractive like gravity

No. The effects in general are not as simple as just changing the magnitude of a central force. (That is also true of ordinary magnetism.)
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top