New planet that doesnt fit with kepler's 3rd law

  • Thread starter Thread starter edoarad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fit Law Planet
AI Thread Summary
To determine the mass of a newly discovered planet that does not conform to Kepler's third law, it's essential to consider the barycenter of the system, which is influenced by the masses of both the Sun and the planet. If the planet's mass is significant compared to the Sun, it will affect the orbital period, resulting in a shorter cycle length than expected. Calculating the distance from the planet to the barycenter and the required orbital speed can help derive an equation that incorporates the planet's mass. By substituting known values into this equation, the planet's mass can be solved. This approach allows for a more accurate understanding of the planet's dynamics within the solar system.
edoarad
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


i need to find the mass of a new found planet at a given radius from the sun (R) and with a given cycle length (T)


Homework Equations


Kepler and Newton


The Attempt at a Solution


of course if R and T would fit with keplers third law then there would be no way to find the mass but because it doesn't fit (T is shorter than it should have been) i thought that mabye M is big enough so that it could enfluance the sun. i tried finding the center of mass but that didnt lead to anywhere..

hope someone can help me :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The orbital period / distance of a planet is not related to it's mass. The distribution of masses of the planets is an effect of how they were formed.
 
thank you
 
edoarad said:

Homework Statement


i need to find the mass of a new found planet at a given radius from the sun (R) and with a given cycle length (T)

Homework Equations


Kepler and Newton

The Attempt at a Solution


of course if R and T would fit with keplers third law then there would be no way to find the mass but because it doesn't fit (T is shorter than it should have been) i thought that mabye M is big enough so that it could enfluance the sun. i tried finding the center of mass but that didnt lead to anywhere..

hope someone can help me :)

You're on the right track. The Sun and any planet orbit their barycenter, or center of mass of the system. For instance, if they were of equal mass, they orbit a point halfway between them. For planets very small compared to the Sun, the barycenter is very nearly at the center of the Sun. In these cases you can safely ignore the mass of the planet, as it will make no noticeable difference.

When as the mass of the planet becomes greater, you start to see a difference.

In these cases, you have to take the position of the barycenter into account. A more massive planet will result in a shorter period.

Here's how you can do that:

Take the distance between Sun and planet and their respective masses to find the distance from planet to barycenter (Rb)

Determine the speed the planet would have to move in a circle with a radius of Rb so that the gravitational force between the Sun and planet is just enough to hold it in that circular path.

Determine how long it takes for the planet to travel a circle with a radius of Rb at that speed.

Since in your case you don't know the mass of the planet, you'll have to just use a variable for it as you go along. At the end you should get an equation that gives you the period of the orbit while taking the mass of the planet into account. Once you have this, you can plug in all the knowns and solve for the mass of the planet.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top