Newbie Questions on Band Gap and Fermi Level

mzottola
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am new to solid state physics, having been in computational chemistry (quantum mechanics) for the larger part of my career. Hence have a lot of newbie like questions that are not easily answered by google/wikipedia searching.

1)In viewing a 1-dimensional band gap diagram, crossing the Fermi line from from either the conducting to non conducting zone or vice versa, is indicative of a metallic substance. Is this correct?

2) In band gap diagrams where there is no crossing of the Fermi line/level, the band gap can still be calculated by measuring the energy difference between the closest approach of the bands in the conducting and non-conducting zones?

3) Are there generally accepted band gaps that one can say a system is either conducting/semiconducting/nonconducting?

4) If the Fermi level for a system changes from a positive value to a negative value, is it a reasonable conclusion that the the system with the lower Fermi level would be more likely to allow charge migration, i.e. a current flow?

Any help and recommendations for an easily read primer are also greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) yes

2) yes

3) There is a grey zone between non-conducting and wide-gap semiconductors in the range 3-5 eV. Diamond is usally seen as a pretty good insulator, but in some applications it is used and treated like a semiconductor. Similarly, if there is a very small band gap, smaller than kT, then the system may behave like a "bad metal".

4) not always. Think of an electron-doped semiconductor. You would have to increase the Fermi energy to increase the number of carriers. For a hole-doped semiconductor it is the opposite, of course.
 
Thanks - I appreciate your timely and clear response.
 
my pleasure
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top