Newton's Law of Cooling Flawed?

AI Thread Summary
Newton's Law of Cooling has limitations when applied to scenarios where the final temperature is negative while the environment remains positive, as this leads to mathematical impossibilities like taking the logarithm of a negative number. Similarly, if the final temperature equals the surrounding temperature, the formula results in an undefined situation due to the logarithm of zero. The discussions highlight that cooling an object cannot surpass the ambient temperature, and it can only asymptotically approach it over time. Thus, the formula is useful for calculating the cooling time from an initial to a final temperature but cannot be applied in cases where the final temperature is unattainable. Understanding these constraints clarifies the practical applications of the formula.
MHrtz
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Newton's Law of Cooling (not the formal definition):

(change in time) = -ln ((Tf - S)/(Ti - S)) / k

Tf = final temperature
Ti = initial temperature
S = temperature of environment
k = heat transfer coefficient

Say that you wanted to cool something (such as a person) to a negative temperature (Tf would be negative) and the temperature of the environment was positive. This would mean that you would have to take the -ln (-#). Obviously, you can't do this. In another situation, say the surrounding temperature was the same as the final temperature. This would mean that you would have to take the -ln (0) which can't be done. How can I apply this formula to these situations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi MHrtz, welcome to PF. Perhaps that's an indication that it's not possible to cool something by warming it? :smile:

For the other part: conduction can only bring an object's temperature asymptotically close to the surrounding environment's. In other words, you can get arbitrarily close to the ambient temperature, but in theory it would take infinite time (-\ln 0) to reach it. Does this help answer your question?
 
what you actually compute here is the time that an object takes to cool from T_i to
T_f. The fact that you get no answer in the first case is to be expected because the object wil never cool to a temperature below the environment.
You get no answer in the second case, because you try to compute the time that your object reaches T_f, but your object is at T_f all the time.
 
Ok, I see what you mean. I guess I was too focused on the formula itself rather than what it implied. Thank you for the help.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top