Newton's shell theorem & Nuclear Fusion

AI Thread Summary
Newton's shell theorem indicates that the gravitational force from mass outside a radius within a solid sphere is zero, but this does not account for the weight of the shell itself, which exerts a compressive force inward. The pressure in the Earth's core and the Sun's core is generated by the weight of the surrounding mass, which, while it does not exert a net gravitational force on objects inside, still contributes to the overall pressure due to its mass. The gravitational attraction between the shell's mass and itself leads to a squeezing effect, creating the necessary conditions for core solidity and nuclear fusion. This understanding reconciles the apparent contradiction between the shell theorem and the pressures experienced at the core. The discussion clarifies how gravitational forces and electromagnetic repulsion interact to maintain core integrity.
willoughby
Messages
23
Reaction score
4
I have a problem reconciling something. According to Newton's shell theorem, at any point within a solid sphere, for the purposes of calculating the gravitational force exerted on you, the mass that is outside your own radius to the center can be ignored since it cancels out, and the net force from any mass outside your radius is zero. I understand this theorem, and it makes complete sense. What I have a problem with is if this is the case, then what is causing the enormous amount of pressure that causes the Earth's core to remain solid? What causes the pressure in the sun's core that allows fusion to occur? Can someone please reconcile these two concepts for me. It seems to me, that the farther you get to the center, the LESS force there is from gravity. In other words, if the mass OUTSIDE your radius exerts a net force of ZERO, then WHAT is pushing DOWN on you in the core? What is compressing the core?

I hope this isn't a dumb question. First time posting in this forum. That would be a rough start!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
willoughby said:
if the mass OUTSIDE your radius exerts a net force of ZERO, then WHAT is pushing DOWN on you in the core?
The mass outside your radius exerts a GRAVITATIONAL net force of zero. What is pushing down is ELECTROMAGNETIC repulsion.
 
willoughby said:
I have a problem reconciling something. According to Newton's shell theorem, at any point within a solid sphere, for the purposes of calculating the gravitational force exerted on you, the mass that is outside your own radius to the center can be ignored since it cancels out, and the net force from any mass outside your radius is zero. I understand this theorem, and it makes complete sense. What I have a problem with is if this is the case, then what is causing the enormous amount of pressure that causes the Earth's core to remain solid? What causes the pressure in the sun's core that allows fusion to occur? Can someone please reconcile these two concepts for me. It seems to me, that the farther you get to the center, the LESS force there is from gravity. In other words, if the mass OUTSIDE your radius exerts a net force of ZERO, then WHAT is pushing DOWN on you in the core? What is compressing the core?

The gravitational pull of the shell on anything inside the shell is indeed zero. But the shell still has weight - left to its own devices it would fall inwards, and that's where the crushing force comes from.

The easiest way to see this might be to calculate the gravitational force (from the shell itself) experienced by a point ON the shell, as opposed to inside it. That force is non-zero and inwards-directed everywhere on the shell.
 
Nugatory said:
The easiest way to see this might be to calculate...
Or even simpler: Consider two identical massive spheres in space, touching each other. If you are placed right between them, the net gravitational force on you is zero, because their attraction ON YOU cancels. But they are still attracting EACH OTHER, so they will squeeze you.
 
A.T. said:
Or even simpler: Consider two identical massive spheres in space, touching each other. If you are placed right between them, the net gravitational force on you is zero, because their attraction ON YOU cancels. But they are still attracting EACH OTHER, so they will squeeze you.

This is what lit the light bulb for me. This is a perfect explanation. I completely understand. Thanks a lot!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top