Newtons third law and quantum mechanics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between Newton's third law of motion and quantum mechanics, particularly focusing on the behavior of electrons, protons, and neutrons within an atom. Participants explore the implications of quantum mechanics on classical concepts of motion and force.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that Newton's third law states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction, questioning why a trajectory for electrons cannot be established if protons and neutrons have defined positions and speeds.
  • Another participant claims that Newton's laws, including the third law, are not applicable in the quantum realm and may not hold true even in classical systems under certain conditions.
  • A participant explains that quantum mechanics does not typically reference force as in Newtonian mechanics, emphasizing energy as the relevant concept and citing experiments like the double slit experiment to illustrate that particles do not have definite trajectories.
  • It is noted that in systems with magnetic forces, Newton's third law may not be valid in its original form.
  • One participant challenges the assertion that the positions and speeds of protons and neutrons are known, stating that the uncertainty in their positions is generally smaller than that of electrons due to their larger mass. They propose a mathematical expression to show how Newton's third law can be reconciled with quantum mechanics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of Newton's third law in quantum mechanics, with no consensus reached on whether it can be reconciled with quantum principles. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of quantum mechanics on classical laws of motion.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the positions and speeds of subatomic particles, as well as the dependence on definitions of force and motion in different contexts. The discussion reflects ongoing uncertainties in the interpretation of quantum mechanics.

shivakumar06
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
dear sir,
we know that third law of motion says that every action has a equal and opposite reaction. quantum mechanics tells us that it is possible not predict the position as well as the speed of electron. i like to know if electrons ,protons and neutrons form a system called atom. each of the components interact with each other and we also know where the protons and neutron are in nucleus and their speed. my question is if i am correct why can not we have a equation for path of electron?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Newtons laws are not correct in the quantum realm.
In fact Newton's third law isn't even correct for many systems in the Newtonian realm.
 
In quantum mechanics, reference is usually not made to the concept of force like in Newton's mechanics. The relevant concept in QM is that of energy, similar to classical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics.

It is possible to demonstrate by several experiments, like the double slit experiment, that a particle can "be in several places at once" between consequent measurements of its position. Therefore, its useless to try to make a theory where electrons have a definite trajectory.
 
HomogenousCow said:
In fact Newton's third law isn't even correct for many systems in the Newtonian realm.

Yes, in a system with magnetic forces the 3rd law is not valid in its original form.
 
and we also know where the protons and neutron are in nucleus and their speed. [/QUOTE]
No, we don't know the position of neither the protons nor of the neutrons but the uncertainty of the position of these particles is usually smaller to the uncertainty of the position of the electrons due to the larger mass of protons and neutrons. To show that Newtons third law is valid in QM one can express the force F acting on an electron as ## F=\frac{i}{\hbar} [H,p]## and the corresponding force acting on a nucleus as ##\frac{i}{\hbar} [H,P]##, where p and P are the momentum operators of the electron and nucleus, respectively. Now as ##P+\sum p## is a constant of motion for an atom also in QM (i.e. it commutes with H), the force acting on the nucleus must equal the sum of the forces acting on the electrons.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K