Newton's Third Law, Gravity, and the Planck Length

AI Thread Summary
An object with a mass of 10^-12 kg exerting a force of 10^-11 Newtons on Earth would cause an imperceptible acceleration of 10^-36 m/s^2, resulting in movement less than the Planck length. This raises the question of whether such a small mass can affect Earth at a distance, with the consensus leaning towards it being negligible. In classical physics, the Earth could theoretically move over such a distance, but this scenario enters speculative territory regarding gravity and quantum effects. The discussion highlights the complexities of measuring such interactions and the implications of physical laws on hypothetical scenarios. Ultimately, the topic underscores the intriguing nature of gravitational interactions at extreme scales.
kmarinas86
Messages
974
Reaction score
1
If you have a object that is about 10^36 less massive than the Earth (about 10^-12 kg) and say it exerts a force on the Earth about 10^-11 Newtons, this would cause the Earth to accelerate about 10^-36 m/s^2. If this object was away from earth, and say if these objects were initial stationary towards each other, in one second, the Earth would travel a distance of .5at^2, which would be .5*10^-36 m, less than the Planck length? So does such a small mass affect the Earth at all at a distance? Does the Earth move if the 10^-12 kg object does?
 
Science news on Phys.org
I would say that given that this is not measureable by any standard in any near or not so near future, that the answer to your question is entirely hypothetical. As such, it depends on the paradigm in which you place yourself.

Of course, in classical physics, given that there is no minimum length scale in that paradigm, there's no problem assuming that the Earth is moving over that distance. And, if not in classical physics, you enter in any case the twilight zone of speculation about gravity and quantum effects: I don't even think that string theorists, or LQG people, would be able to give you a precise answer in their speculative paradigms, or might even have several different views on the subject.
 
To answer your question k the Earth would not move at all because you're talking about an immensely small mass versus one of gargantuan proportions. All that might happen is that, when that little object explodes due to an impact or something in space, some of the particles might make it to Earth.
 
I consider this to be an exceptionally interesting question.
To be sure, if the "outcome" of a physical intervention is not permitted due to certain laws what, then, is to be made of the permitted initiating process? A catch-22, else one ends up with an action without a reaction in this case.

The reason I find this of interest is that I have been inspecting the potentially bizarre consequences of "forced violation"

I realize that these types of comments from me do not belong in this thread so I will stop here.
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top