Newton's Third Law - Interacting Systems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving two blocks, where the upper block is tied to a wall and the lower block is being pulled with a tension force. Participants analyze the forces acting on each block, particularly the tension in the rope and the friction forces, noting the importance of correctly identifying the direction of friction. One user recalculates the net forces after receiving feedback about the signs and friction forces, ultimately solving for the tension in the rope. However, they struggle with calculating the correct acceleration for the lower block, indicating a misunderstanding of the forces at play. The conversation emphasizes the need for careful consideration of all forces and their directions in solving the problem.
mantillab
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The 1.0 kg block in the figure (attached) is tied to the wall with a rope. It sits on top of the 2.0 kg block. The lower block is pulled to the right with a tension force of 20 N. The coefficient of kinetic friction at both the lower and upper surfaces of the 2.0 kg block is mu_k = 0.500.

What is the tension in the rope holding the 1.0 kg block to the wall?
What is the acceleration of the 2.0 kg block?

Homework Equations



F_a on b = -F_b on a
a_ax = - a_bx

The Attempt at a Solution



I started by drawing force diagrams for both boxes and then calculating the net force in the x-direction for each box.

For box 1:
Fnet x = -T_1 - (mu_k)(n) = -1T_1 - (0.5)(9.8)(1) = -1T_1 - 4.9

For box 2:
Fnet x = T_2 - 2(mu_k)(n) = 20 - (2)(0.5)(20.6) = -0.6

At this point, I've tried to find the acceleration by setting the Fnet = ma, but get the wrong answer for the acceleration and solving for T_1. Anyone know where I may be making the mistake?
 

Attachments

  • knight_Figure_08_27.jpg
    knight_Figure_08_27.jpg
    4.4 KB · Views: 874
Physics news on Phys.org
mantillab said:
F_a on b = -F_b on a
a_ax = - a_bx
The first equation's true but the second is not: the top box doesn't accelerate.

The Attempt at a Solution



I started by drawing force diagrams for both boxes and then calculating the net force in the x-direction for each box.

For box 1:
Fnet x = -T_1 - (mu_k)(n) = -1T_1 - (0.5)(9.8)(1) = -1T_1 - 4.9
(1) Careful with signs: What direction does the friction act?
(2) What does the net force equal?

For box 2:
Fnet x = T_2 - 2(mu_k)(n) = 20 - (2)(0.5)(20.6) = -0.6
Recompute the friction forces. Realize that there are two friction forces acting on box 2, but they are not the same; write each one separately.
 
The first equation's true but the second is not: the top box doesn't accelerate.

Doc Al said:
(1) Careful with signs: What direction does the friction act?
(2) What does the net force equal?

Recompute the friction forces. Realize that there are two friction forces acting on box 2, but they are not the same; write each one separately.

Thanks! I rewrote the Fnet as you suggested:

Box 1: Fnetx = (mu_k)(n) - T1 = 4.9 - T1
Box 2: Fnetx = T2 - (mu_k)(9.8)(1) - (mu_k)(9.8)(2) = 5.3

I set Box 1 Fnet = 0 and was able to solve for the first part of the problem.

For the second part of the problem (finding the acceleration of box 2), I tried to use:
Fnet = (m)(a) = 5.3 = (2)(a)
which gave me 2.65 m/s for acceleration, which was incorrect.

I'm assuming I have to use the Fnet for box 2 because it does have a net force, unlike box 1. Did I calculate Fnetx for box 2 incorrectly?
 
mantillab said:
Box 1: Fnetx = (mu_k)(n) - T1 = 4.9 - T1
Box 2: Fnetx = T2 - (mu_k)(9.8)(1) - (mu_k)(9.8)(2) = 5.3
That second friction force is incorrect. Hint: What's the total force that box 2 exerts on the floor?
 
Doc Al said:
That second friction force is incorrect. Hint: What's the total force that box 2 exerts on the floor?

Thanks so much! I had just realized that I had to change the mass somewhere when you replied. Thanks again for pointing me in the right direction!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top