Is the Oxidation State of Nitrate Really +5 or +4?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spirochete
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oxidation State
AI Thread Summary
Nitrate (NO3-) has an oxidation state of +5 due to the formal charge distribution among its oxygen atoms, despite having four bonds to oxygen. The oxidation state is calculated based on the overall charge of the ion and the electronegativity of the atoms involved, not merely the number of bonds. In the molecular form as nitric acid (HNO3), the nitrogen is bonded to oxygen in various forms, contributing to its +5 state. The confusion arises from the presence of a negative charge on one oxygen, which affects the overall oxidation state of nitrogen. Understanding these concepts clarifies why nitrate is assigned an oxidation state of +5.
Spirochete
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
Why does nitrate (NO3-) have an oxidation state of +5? Doesn't it have 4 bonds to oxygen? Shouldn't that give it an oxidation state of +4?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
read this, http://http://www.chem.lsu.edu/lucid/allen/OxNumbers.htm"

Oxidation numbers are not determined by the number of bonds to the atom
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That link doesn't work for me and I am still wondering about this topic. Anybody else want to fill me in?
 
In NO3-, the negative charge is on the oxygen. in molecular form, it would have been nitric acid, HNO3. there is an N-O-H bond, a N=O bond and a N<=O bond (dative).

In NO3-, the N-O-H bond becomes N-O^-

it has 5 'bonds' to oxygen. (1 double bond, 1 dative double bond and 1 single bond with O-)
 
Spirochete-Are you referring to the oxidation state of the nitrogen atom?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top