NMR - does rf cause transitions or simply rotate the magn vector?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the role of RF radiation in NMR, questioning whether it is absorbed by protons to induce spin state transitions or merely serves to manipulate the magnetization vector. While a classical approach may suffice for basic spin-1/2 nuclei, more complex scenarios, such as those involving quadrupolar nuclei, require a deeper understanding beyond the vector model. The conversation highlights the distinction between quantum mechanical and classical interpretations of NMR, noting that both perspectives can coexist within their respective frameworks. There is a call for further reading on RF absorption and NMR, particularly referencing David Hoult's work. Understanding how the magnetization vector transitions from the z-axis to the xy-plane is a key point of confusion for participants.
mrquantum
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Am I wrong in thinking that the rf radiation used in nmr is not "absorbed" by protons to cause transitions between spin states but rather it is only there to provide a magnetic field which can rotate the magnetisation vector away from the primary field?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You can think that way. The issue is that the magnetization vector picture eventually loses the ability to really make sense of or devise the kinds of experiments people are interested in conducting.

One can get away with a fairly classical approach to magnetic resonance for spin-1/2 nuclei and imaging, to a large extent, but if, for example, one wants to work for my one former labmate - who does all kinds of stuff with quadrupolar nuclei in inorganic and biological solids, including dynamics and relaxation studies - just sticking with the vector model isn't going to cut it.

If you're interested in further reading, I'd suggest digging up the work of David Hoult on the nature of RF absorption and NMR over the last ~ 20 years. I can dig up the references, but I'll have to get back to you on that.
 
Last edited:
mrquantum, despite your name you have confused the quantum mechanical and classical pictures of NMR. Quantum mechanically a photon is indeed absorbed by the nucleus, which makes a transition between states. In the classical view, RF radiation causes the spin to precess at the Larmor frequency about the direction of the static magnetic field such that its polar angle changes. Both views are correct within their model universes.
 
I don't understand how both can be correct. Is the RF radiation absorbed and re-emitted or does it pass straight through the sample.

I'm basically trying to understand how the magnetisation vector (along +z) gets tipped into the xy-plane, or, if you like, how the z component of each nuclei's spin angular momentum is transferred into spin angular momentum in the x and y directions.

What am I misunderstanding? Does anybody know any good articles that will elucidate the difference between the quantum mechanical and classical approaches to NMR?
 
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
Back
Top