NMR: How Does It Work? Confused by 2 Explanations

  • Thread starter Thread starter CrimpJiggler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nmr Work
AI Thread Summary
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) involves protons aligning with an external magnetic field, where radio frequency (RF) radiation causes spins to flip between -1/2 and 1/2 states. Confusion arises from differing explanations, with one suggesting protons wobble around the magnetic field axis, absorbing energy at the Larmor frequency. Both descriptions are valid; the energy difference between spin states and the Larmor frequency are interconnected concepts. The absorbed RF energy alters the magnetic vector, causing it to drop into the XY plane rather than simply flipping spins. Understanding these interactions requires a grasp of quantum mechanics, particularly the concept of superposition and its evolution over time.
CrimpJiggler
Messages
141
Reaction score
1
I've read two different explanations so I'm confused. The way I thought NMR works is that the protons spins align with the external magnetic field, then the RF radiation applied causes the spins to flip from -1/2 to 1/2, if the frequency of the radio waves are equal to the energy difference between these two spin states.

Now I read a different explanation which has me confused. Here:
http://www.simplyphysics.com/page2_4.html
it says that the protons actually wobble around the axis of the external magnetic field, and when you apply radio waves with energy equal to the frequency of this wobbling (Larmor frequency), then the protons absorb it. Which is it? Is it the energy difference between the two spin states, or is it the energy of the Larmor frequency? According to this animation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YBUSOrH0lw&list=PLC40660311CD1C353
the absorbed RF energy causes the magnetic vector axis to drop to the XY plane, so that it is now tangent to the axis of the external magnetic field. This clearly isn't the same thing as a spin flip, so I'm confused.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Both descriptions are correct but it is not so easy to explain why without a basic understanding of quantum mechanics. The point is that as long as you don't explicitly analyze whether a given spin point up or down, it can also be in a superposition which corresponds to the spin pointing at least partially somewhere into the x-y plane. This is not an energy eigenstate, so it will evolve in time. Actually this turns out to a revolution of the axis of the spin in the x-y plane, i.e. the wobbling with the Lamor frequency. Now if the spin interacts with radiation you change that superposition and rotate the spin into or out of the x-y plane.
 
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
Back
Top