No 2D momentum average for a particle in a box?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the expectation value of momentum squared, , for a two-dimensional particle confined in a box with dimensions 0 using integrals of wave functions but encounters confusion regarding the application of the momentum operator and the distinction between and p^2. Key insights include the relationship between and energy , emphasizing that each momentum component corresponds to its respective energy component.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically the Schrödinger equation.
  • Familiarity with expectation values in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of wave functions and their properties in a confined system.
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration techniques for solving quantum problems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of expectation values in quantum mechanics, focusing on calculations.
  • Learn about the Hamiltonian operator and its role in quantum systems.
  • Explore the concept of wave functions in two-dimensional quantum systems.
  • Investigate the relationship between momentum and energy in quantum mechanics, particularly in confined systems.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, as well as chemistry majors seeking to understand quantum principles related to particle confinement and momentum calculations.

Duave
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone, Happy Thanksgiving. I have physics issues. I went around the entire boundless universe in the last two days, and found out the Schrödinger forgot to develop the math for the momentum expectation value for a 2-D particle in a box. It's nowhere to be found. I am a chemistry major, and so I need help from the physics department to engineer the math to complete quantum mechanics. Can anyone help me with my marvelous discovery below? It's series of equations used as an attempt to solve the problem that I posted. Everyone's help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.


Homework Statement


Suppose that a particle of mass m is confined to a rectangular region between 0<x<L and 0<y<L/2 by an infinitely high potential energy function.

Calculate the expectation value p^{2}, the square of the magnitude of the momentum


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



p^2(x)=∫(2/L) sin(n*pi*x/L)(ih[d/dx](2/L) sin(n*pi*x/L)dx
p^2(y)=∫(4/L) sin(2n*pi*y/L)(ih[d/dx](4/L) sin(2n*pi*y/L)dy
<p^2> =p^2(x) +p^2(y)
<p^2> =1/2 +1
<p^2> =3/2
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The basic idea is good but the results of your integrals are wrong.
On the other hand this problem is usually done without doing the integrals.:wink:
Think about the relation between <p^2> and <E> is, considering that the Hamiltonian is H=p^2/2m inside the box. Try doing it for the 1D case then go for the 2D case.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
@bp_psy,

Thank you for your response. The image that I posted is of the one-dimensional case.

https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/541843_10151745284505919_675157014_n.jpg

It's all over the internet, and I still had to ask about the 2D case. I don't understand "how to take it to the next level".

1. The problem statement (with respect to your response)

I'm not sure if I can just solve P^2 by simply:

P^2(x)/2m = E

3. The Attempt at a Solution (with respect to your response)

P^2(x)= 2m*E
E=\frac{h^2}{8mL^2}*[n^2(i) +4*n^2(ii)]

hence,

P^2(x)= 2m*\frac{h^2}{8mL^2}*[n^2(i) +n^2(ii)]

hence,

P^2(y)= 2m*\frac{h^2}{8mL^2}*[n^2(i) +4*n^2(ii)]

P^2= P^2(x) + P^2(y)

P^2= {2m*\frac{h^2}{8mL^2}*[n^2(i) +n^2(ii)]} + {2m*\frac{h^2}{8mL^2}*[n^2(i) +4*n^2(ii)]}

P^2= 2m*E

{2m*\frac{h^2}{8mL^2}*[n^2(i) +n^2(ii)]} + {2m*\frac{h^2}{8mL^2}*[n^2(i) +4*n^2(ii)]} = \frac{h^2}{8mL^2}*[n^2(i) +4*n^2(ii)]



I'M LOST...
 
You seem to get the basic idea but you should always mark when you are talking about expectations <p(x)>^2 is not the same as p(x)^2 and E is not the same as <E>.
Duave said:
@bp_psy,

P^2(x)= 2m*E
E=\frac{h^2}{8mL^2}*[n^2(i) +4*n^2(ii)]

No each direction is associated with some of the energy not the whole energy.So just one of the ns, n_x for p_x and n_y for p_y


In this case <p>^2/2m=(1/2m)(<p(x)>^2+<p(y)>^2)=<E>=<E_x>+<E_y>. Each component of the momentum is associated with some of the energy. The energy associated with each direction is the same as for the the 1D case You are also missing some ∏ factors and you forget to simplify some m factors.
 
Duave said:
Hello Everyone, Happy Thanksgiving. I have physics issues. I went around the entire boundless universe in the last two days, and found out the Schrödinger forgot to develop the math for the momentum expectation value for a 2-D particle in a box. It's nowhere to be found. I am a chemistry major, and so I need help from the physics department to engineer the math to complete quantum mechanics. Can anyone help me with my marvelous discovery below? It's series of equations used as an attempt to solve the problem that I posted. Everyone's help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.


Homework Statement


Suppose that a particle of mass m is confined to a rectangular region between 0<x<L and 0<y<L/2 by an infinitely high potential energy function.

Calculate the expectation value p^{2}, the square of the magnitude of the momentum


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



p^2(x)=∫(2/L) sin(n*pi*x/L)(ih[d/dx](2/L) sin(n*pi*x/L)dx
p^2(y)=∫(4/L) sin(2n*pi*y/L)(ih[d/dx](4/L) sin(2n*pi*y/L)dy
<p^2> =p^2(x) +p^2(y)
<p^2> =1/2 +1
<p^2> =3/2

This is how to proceed with calculating any expectation value (this has nothing to do with physics by the way, it's elementary probability theory). And you're basically right, except you're trying to calculate the average of p^2, yet you're only applying p once in the integral. Make sure you apply p two times to get the average of p^2.

I'm not sure what you're doing in line 3, but just compute the integral you have there in line 2 with the momentum operator applied twice over the region where the wave function is not zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K