No free particle in real world

matness
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
maybe it is an easy question but i confuse a bit


wave func of free particle is A exp(ikx) and probability over all space is
A^2 so it is possible to find this particle everywhere


Does it mean "there exist no free particle in real world" ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
matness said:
maybe it is an easy question but i confuse a bit


wave func of free particle is A exp(ikx) and probability over all space is
A^2 so it is possible to find this particle everywhere


Does it mean "there exist no free particle in real world" ?

At some point, you have to consider what is "small enough" to no longer be significant, and what is "large enough" to consider it to be edgeless.

On paper, the influence of the gravity from Alpha Centauri is not zero. But it would look silly if all our dynamical description would have to include such things. The same thing with "free electron". Compare to its "size", such as its deBroglie wavelength, there are MANY situation in which the electron has no clue that it has a boundary. In a typical metal, the conduction electron in your tiny wires can be considered as "free" electrons. This is because using such an approximation (called the Drude model), we could obtain practically all the usual properties of a conductor, such as Ohm's Law. When it works this well, it is very difficult to argue that such an assumption is incorrect.

Other situations such as in particle accelerators explicitly considers charged particles/electrons to be free.

Zz.
 
matness said:
wave func of free particle

...with a completely definite value of momentum p, that is, \Delta p = 0...

is A exp(ikx)

...where k = p / \hbar...

and probability over all space is A^2 so it is possible to find this particle everywhere

...that is, \Delta x = \infty.


Does it mean "there exist no free particle in real world" ?

No, it means, "there exist no free particle with \Delta p = 0 in the real world." A realistic wave function for a free particle is a wave packet: a superposition of waves with a finite spread \Delta p in momentum, which leads to a finite spatial width \Delta x according to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle.
 
Doing physics means making appropriate approximations.
The plane wave WF is very useful for many of these.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top