No Limits of Integration for Electric Field Integral?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the integration limits for calculating the electric field from a uniformly charged ring. The absence of integration limits is justified by the assumption that all charge elements across the ring contribute to a total charge Q. A uniform linear charge density is defined, allowing for the calculation of charge elements and their integration around the ring. The conversation also clarifies that the ring is treated as "thin," meaning its width is negligible for the calculations. If the ring had a width, a different approach involving integration over the radial dimensions would be necessary.
member 731016
Homework Statement
This is a more concise version of my 'Electric Field of a Uniform Ring of Charge' thread that I posted yesterday and made a typo.
Relevant Equations
Continuous charge distribution formula
For this problem,

s7y2w.png
uCKQS.png


The solution is,

ok160.png


However, why have they not included limits of integration? I think this is because all the small charge elements dq across the ring add up to Q.

However, how would you solve this problem with limits of integration?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can assume a uniform linear charge density on the ring, ##\lambda=\dfrac{Q}{2\pi a}.## Then an arc element ##ds## at polar angle ##\phi## in the plane of the ring subtends angle ##d\phi## so that ##ds=a d\phi##. The charge on that element is ##dq=\lambda ds=\lambda a d\phi## so that when you integrate going around the ring once, you have $$\int dq=\int_0^{2\pi}\lambda a d\phi=2\pi a\lambda=2\pi a\frac{Q}{2\pi a}=Q$$Does this answer your question?
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
kuruman said:
You can assume a uniform linear charge density on the ring, ##\lambda=\dfrac{Q}{2\pi a}.## Then an arc element ##ds## at polar angle ##\phi## in the plane of the ring subtends angle ##d\phi## so that ##ds=a d\phi##. The charge on that element is ##dq=\lambda ds=\lambda a d\phi## so that when you integrate going around the ring once, you have $$\int dq=\int_0^{2\pi}\lambda a d\phi=2\pi a\lambda=2\pi a\frac{Q}{2\pi a}=Q$$Does this answer your question?
Thanks for your answer @kuruman, I think that answers my question for now!
 
kuruman said:
You can assume a uniform linear charge density on the ring, ##\lambda=\dfrac{Q}{2\pi a}.## Then an arc element ##ds## at polar angle ##\phi## in the plane of the ring subtends angle ##d\phi## so that ##ds=a d\phi##. The charge on that element is ##dq=\lambda ds=\lambda a d\phi## so that when you integrate going around the ring once, you have $$\int dq=\int_0^{2\pi}\lambda a d\phi=2\pi a\lambda=2\pi a\frac{Q}{2\pi a}=Q$$Does this answer your question?
Sorry @kuruman, why are you allowed to use the linear charge density, because doesn't the ring have a width too?

Are you assuming that x >> width, so the width is negligible?

Many thanks!
 
Callumnc1 said:
Sorry @kuruman, why are you allowed to use the linear charge density, because doesn't the ring have a width too?
No, it does not have a width because the calculation assumes that it is a "thin" ring which means zero width. If it has a width, say it is a washer of inner radius ##a## and outer radius ##b##, then you have to do a different calculation and also integrate over ##r## from ##a## to ##b##. That's a different homework problem.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes cwill53 and member 731016
  • Like
Likes cwill53 and kuruman
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Back
Top