No. of field equations and components or Riemann tensor?

damnedcat
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
no. of field equations and components or Riemann tensor??

Someone was trying to explain to me about curvature in space. From what I got from what they were saying doesn't make sense to me. I'm not sure I understand what the number of components, N, of R\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta when compared to
the number of field equations, M, implies about curvature (when i say compare i mean: N>M, N<M, N=M). I thought looking at just the Riemann tensor tells u about curvature. mYBE i Just didn't get what he was saying. Any help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Was your friend referring to something like this? http://www.lightandmatter.com/html_books/genrel/ch08/ch08.html See section 8.1.2, first para.

-Ben
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Something like that. He was saying that certain property can only occur for space times of more than 3 spatial dimensions. Since for instance the einstein eqn for vacuum in 1,2 and 3 dimensions have the number of field equations being less than or equal to the number of components of the Riemann tensor. I think he was talking about curvature of the space.
 


Sorry, but can you clarify by what you mean by alpha/beta/gamma/delta ?
 


nicksauce said:
Sorry, but can you clarify by what you mean by alpha/beta/gamma/delta ?

I think he means the indicies of the Riemann tensor?
 


damnedcat said:
Something like that. He was saying that certain property can only occur for space times of more than 3 spatial dimensions. Since for instance the einstein eqn for vacuum in 1,2 and 3 dimensions have the number of field equations being less than or equal to the number of components of the Riemann tensor. I think he was talking about curvature of the space.

I think this must be somewhat garbled. In any number of dimensions, the Riemann tensor, which has 4 indices, has at least as many independent components as the Ricci tensor, which has two indices and is constructed from it. The Einstein tensor has the same number of components as the Ricci tensor. The field equations have the Einstein tensor on one side. So the number of field equations will always be equal to the number of components in the Ricci and Einstein tensors, and less than or equal to the number of components in the Riemann tensor.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Back
Top