MHB No problem! Glad I could help.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnx1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a system of equations to determine the cost of a badminton racquet. Two equations are established based on the costs of badminton racquets and baseball bats, leading to the conclusion that one badminton racquet costs $25. The method of elimination is highlighted as an effective approach to solve the equations. Participants agree that while the original method was correct, using single letters for variables could simplify the process. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity and efficiency in mathematical problem-solving.
Johnx1
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
3 badminton racquets and 2 baseball bats cost \$167. 1 badminton racquet and 3 baseball bats cost \$163. How much does 1 badminton racquet cost?

My answer:

=> 1 badminton = 163 - 3baseball

=> 3(163 - 3 baseball) + 2 baseball = 167
= 489 - 9 baseball + 2 baseball = 167

=> 7 baseball = -322
= baseball = 46

=> 3 badminton + 2(46) = 167

so, the answer is badminton = 25Is there a better way to do this, or did I made it more difficult for me?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would let \(R\) be the cost of each racquet and \(B\) be the cost of each bat. Using the information provided, I would write:

$$3R+2B=167$$

$$R+3B=163$$

I would then multiply the first equation by 3 and the second equation by -2:

$$9R+6B=501$$

$$-2R-6B=-326$$

Now, we can add the two equations, and eliminate \(B\), because we are interested in finding \(R\)

$$7R=175$$

And so:

$$R=25\quad\checkmark$$

I don't see anything wrong with what you did, except I would use single letters to represent quantities in your equations. But your method led to the correct answer.
 
MarkFL said:
I would let \(R\) be the cost of each racquet and \(B\) be the cost of each bat. Using the information provided, I would write:

$$3R+2B=167$$

$$R+3B=163$$

I would then multiply the first equation by 3 and the second equation by -2:

$$9R+6B=501$$

$$-2R-6B=-326$$

Now, we can add the two equations, and eliminate \(B\), because we are interested in finding \(R\)

$$7R=175$$

And so:

$$R=25\quad\checkmark$$

I don't see anything wrong with what you did, except I would use single letters to represent quantities in your equations. But your method led to the correct answer.
Thank you for showing me a way doing it by elimination :-)
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K