Nodal analysis with dependent voltage source

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



In attached image. Just curious as to how their nodal analysis is correct.

Homework Equations


[/B]
##I_{in} = I_{out}##

The Attempt at a Solution



Solution in image.

I am just not sure how they applied nodal analysis here to find that ##I_s = \frac{12}{12} + \frac{12}{6} + \frac{12-8}{4}##. If I'm not mistaken, they are just finding V/R, correct? But isn't the voltage in ALL the resistors dependent in some way on both the 12 V source attached and also the dependent voltage source? Why does it seem like they only included the dependent voltage only on the 4-ohm resistor? Is their solution correct?
 

Attachments

  • Photo on 2015-12-12 at 9.44 PM.jpg
    Photo on 2015-12-12 at 9.44 PM.jpg
    40 KB · Views: 527
on Phys.org
Their solution is correct. If the applied independent source were changed to another value all the currents would be affected by the change, yet the resulting ratio of V/Is would turn out the same, yielding the same Rth.

Perhaps you have some doubt about how the node equation itself was written?
 
gneill said:
Their solution is correct. If the applied independent source were changed to another value all the currents would be affected by the change, yet the resulting ratio of V/Is would turn out the same, yielding the same Rth.

Perhaps you have some doubt about how the node equation itself was written?

I guess I'm just not entirely understanding why the dependent voltage source is not considered in these equations for the other 2 resistors. Doesn't this voltage source affect the true voltage across the 6- and 12-ohm resistor, thus requiring this to be included when analyzing the current passing through these resistors? It seems to me that they are considering the voltage through the 6- and 12-ohm resistor to be simply 12 V, but that doesn't appear obvious to me since there is more than one voltage source in this entire circuit.
 
TheCanadian said:
I guess I'm just not entirely understanding why the dependent voltage source is not considered in these equations for the other 2 resistors. Doesn't this voltage source affect the true voltage across the 6- and 12-ohm resistor, thus requiring this to be included when analyzing the current passing through these resistors? It seems to me that they are considering the voltage through the 6- and 12-ohm resistor to be simply 12 V, but that doesn't appear obvious to me since there is more than one voltage source in this entire circuit.
The dependent source is not connected to the node where the 6 and 12 Ohm resistors connect; The external source is. So the external source must set their currents. Nothing can alter the potential difference imposed by a fixed voltage source and in this case the 12 V source is wired directly across those resistors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheCanadian
gneill said:
The dependent source is not connected to the node where the 6 and 12 Ohm resistors connect; The external source is. So the external source must set their currents. Nothing can alter the potential difference imposed by a fixed voltage source and in this case the 12 V source is wired directly across those resistors.

So referencing node b as 0, that makes perfect sense! I was blind, and now I see! :P Thanks!