Non conservative force of a wave on a surfer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by the non-conservative force of a wave on a surfer as she accelerates from 1.93 m/s to 12.3 m/s while descending 2.95 m. The initial calculation of work done by the wave resulted in 7424.66 J, but this was deemed incorrect due to the misunderstanding of the energy contributions. The change in kinetic energy is 5334.5 J, while the change in gravitational potential energy is 2092 J, leading to a discrepancy of 3242.5 J. This difference is interpreted as the work done by the wave, highlighting the need to accurately account for energy transformations in the system. The conclusion emphasizes that the wave provides additional energy beyond the surfer's kinetic and potential energy changes.
thatgirlyouknow
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A surfer is catching a wave. Suppose she starts at the top of the wave with a speed of 1.93 m/s and moves down the wave until her speed reaches 12.3 m/s. The drop in her vertical height is 2.95 m. If her mass is 72.3 kg, how much work is done by the (non-conservative) force of the wave?

Homework Equations



Wnc = Ef-E0
Wnc = .5mvf^2 + mghf - (.5mv0^2 + mgh0)

The Attempt at a Solution



Wnc = .5*72.3*12.3^2 + 72.3*-9.8*0 - (.5*72.3*1.93^2 + 72.3*-9.8*2.95)
.5*72.3*12.3^2 - (.5*72.3*1.93^2 + 72.3*-9.8*2.95)
5469.1335 - (134.66 + (-2090.19))
= 7424.66 J

This should become negative because the non conservative force is opposing displacement (since the surfer is moving down the wave). However, this answer is not correct. What should be changed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Increasing velocity from 1.93 m/s to 12.3 m/s represents a change in kinetic energy of 5334.5 J

And the change in height of 2.95 m represents a change in grav. potential energy of only 2092 J.

So from where does the extra energy/work come?
 
The wave, I suppose... so do I take the total of those two and subtract the number I found?
 
Well the difference in change in kinetic energy and change in potential energy is 3242.5J and presumably that is work done by the wave.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top