Solving an Object Falling with Non-Linear Power Series ODEs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a first-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) related to an object falling under the influence of gravitational and viscous forces. The equation presented is v' + a(v)^3 = b, where the challenge lies in handling the non-linear term caused by the cube of the velocity. Participants suggest transforming the equation into dimensionless variables to simplify the problem, leading to a separable form: y' = 1 - y^3. Integration techniques, including partial fraction decomposition, are discussed to find the solution. The conversation concludes with a mention of exploring polynomial solutions through iteration using the Taylor series, highlighting the complexity of the original problem.
Euler1707
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have not had luck in finding a solution that describes an object falling. Forces include gravitational force which is constant and a vicous force directly proportional to the cube of the velocity. I am supposed to find v as a function of time.

Homework Equations



v' + a(v)^3 = b where a and b are constants.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have a lot of paper crumbled on the floor. I might add that I am just doing this for fun. I am practicing and learning some math. It is my hobby. :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are attempting a power series solution, why don't you tell us what your guess for the series is, and what the ODE looks like after substituting in the series?
 
Steely Dan said:
If you are attempting a power series solution, why don't you tell us what your guess for the series is, and what the ODE looks like after substituting in the series?

Well,

I have attempted to guessv = \Sigmac_{n}t ^{n}

But my problem is the cubed term. Series solutions seem to only be easy when dealing with polynomial coefficients, but this time the dependent variable is causing the non-linearity of the ODE.

I have ofcourse substituted the derivative terms of the power series but I do not know how to cube the series in order to then find the coefficients. Cubing the series would result in a mess.

Thanks for any input.By the way this problem is from an OLD book in mechanics. Very cool read if anyone is interested

Slater and Frank Mechanics 1947.
 
Your equation should be:
<br /> m \, \dot{v} = m \, g - k \, v^3<br />

It is a 1st order ODE in velocity! The one you have is 2nd order. If you introduce dimensionless variables for time and velocity:
<br /> t = a \, x, v = b \, y, \ y = y(x)<br />
then, the equation reduces to:
<br /> m \, \frac{b}{a} \, y&#039;(x) = m \, g - k \, b^3 \, y^3<br />
Let us choose a, and b so that:
<br /> m \, \frac{b}{a} = m \, g = k \, b^3<br />
<br /> a = \left( \frac{m}{k \, g^2} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}}, \ b = \left( \frac{m \, g}{k} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}}<br />
then the ODE simplifies in form:
<br /> y&#039; = 1 - y^3<br />
This equation is with separable variables:
<br /> \frac{dy}{1 - y^3} = dx<br />
Integrating:
<br /> \int_{y_0}^{y}{\frac{dy&#039;}{1 - (y&#039;)^3}} = x, \ y(x = 0) = y_0<br />
Do the partial fraction decomposition:
<br /> \frac{1}{1 - (y&#039;)^3} = \frac{1}{(1 - y&#039;) (1 + y&#039; + (y&#039;)^2)} = \frac{A}{1 - y&#039;} + \frac{B \, y&#039; + C}{1 + y&#039; + (y&#039;)^2}<br />
<br /> 1 = A (1 + y&#039; + (y&#039;)^2) + (B \, y&#039; + C)(1 - y&#039;)<br />
<br /> 1 = (A + C) + (A + B - C) \, y&#039; + (A - B) \, (y&#039;)^2<br />
<br /> \left\lbrace\begin{array}{lcl}<br /> A + C &amp; = &amp; 1 \\<br /> A + B - C &amp; = &amp; 0 \\<br /> A - B &amp; = &amp; 0<br /> \end{array} \right. \Leftrightarrow A = \frac{1}{3} \, B = \frac{1}{3} \, C = \frac{2}{3}<br />
Thus, you have the integrals:
<br /> \frac{1}{3} \, \int_{y_0}^{y}{\frac{dy&#039;}{1 - y&#039;}} + \frac{1}{3} \, \int_{y_0}^{y}{dy&#039; \, \frac{y&#039; + 2}{1 + y&#039; + (y&#039;)^2}} = x<br />
Do the integrals (assuming 0 \le y, \ y_0 &lt; 1
 
Thank you

Your solution is very elegant. Although the book calls for a power series solution ( at least first 4 terms). I was reviewing from my ODE books but like always math books turn out not to have the thing you are looking for. hehe

Nevertheless thanks for taking the time to solve it.

Also yeah, I did realized that I got carried away with the primes. Ofcourse the physical description was enough to figure it out.
 
Oh, I think I might have found a better method that involves a polynomial solution. Maybe just by iteration using the Taylor series. The problem does not say anything about I.C s but I cannot think of anything else. xD
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top