Non-standard calculus (infinitesimals)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around computing the standard part of the expression involving infinitesimals in non-standard calculus. Participants clarify that for positive infinite H, the expression simplifies similarly to standard analysis, leading to the limit as H approaches infinity. They emphasize that while H+1 and H-1 are conceptually different in non-standard analysis, they behave like H for large values in practical calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the properties of unlimited hyperreals, which differ from cardinal numbers. Ultimately, the discussion serves as a learning opportunity for those less familiar with non-standard analysis concepts.
danne89
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Compute the standard part of this, please:
\frac{ \sqrt{H+1}}{ \sqrt{2H} + \sqrt{H-1}}, where H is positive infinite.

It probably should be some algebra trick I'm not familar with.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
infinite can't divided by infinite... your question doesn't make sense at all
I think what you meant was...
\lim_{H \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\sqrt{H+1}}{\sqrt{2H}+\sqrt{H-1}}

hints:
for a very large H, you can assume \sqrt{H+1}= \sqrt{H}
 
No, vincent, he meant what he said. As the title said, this is "non-standard analysis" in which we have both infinite numbers and infinitesmals. (H is a positive infinite number.)

However, the result will be exactly the same as the lim as H-> infinity.

And, yes, it is true that for "infinite" H, H+1= H, H-1= H. This is exactly the same as
\frac{\sqrt{H}}{\sqrt{2H}+\sqrt{H}}= \frac{\sqrt{H}}{(\sqrt{2}+1)\sqrt{H}}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}+1}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One algebra trick, it so happens, is exactly the same as standard analysis: divide the numerator and denominator by the "highest power" of H... in this case, it's 1/2.



And, yes, it is true that for "infinite" H, H+1= H, H-1= H.

That's incorrect: H+1 is never equal to H for any hyperreal, even the unlimited ones. (I think unlimited is the preferred term, over infinite or transfinite)

The unlimited hyperreals don't act like cardinal numbers -- they act like real numbers, in a very real sense. (Pun intended)


However, H/(H+1) would be a limited (aka finite) number with standard part 1, so that could be used fruitfully in this example, by replacing (H+1) with H * ((H+1) / H).
 
Ahh I see! It's really just a beginner calculus book, although it used infinitesimals.
 
Ah! Thanks for clearing up my error, Hurkyl. An expert on non-standard analysis I'm not. (I'm barely competent on STANDARD analysis!)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top