Non-visble Eelectormagntic radition effects on photograph's

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter scott1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Effects
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of non-visible electromagnetic radiation, such as ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) light, on photographs taken with both film and digital cameras. Participants explore whether small amounts of this radiation can influence photographic results and if such effects can be detected with appropriate equipment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if non-visible light can affect photographs, noting that sufficient radiation can impact film.
  • Another participant suggests that if there is enough non-visible light, it could cause the photograph to emit black-body radiation.
  • A different participant mentions that most digital cameras can detect IR signals, referencing an experiment with a remote control's IR transmitter.
  • One participant recalls that X-rays were first detected through the accidental fogging of photographic paper, implying that invisible wavelengths can affect photographic materials.
  • There is a query about whether the discussion pertains to digital photography, with a participant confirming that both digital and film photography are relevant.
  • Another participant raises the possibility of using computer analysis to detect exposure to invisible light waves in photographs.
  • A participant shares a personal experience from the film era, stating that UV filters were necessary to prevent color distortion in snowy photographs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the effects of non-visible light on photography, with no consensus reached on the extent or nature of these effects. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the detection and impact of such radiation.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific definitions of "non-visible light" and may vary based on the type of photography (film vs. digital). The discussion includes references to personal experiences and anecdotal evidence, which may not cover all relevant scientific principles.

scott1
Messages
353
Reaction score
1
Can nonvisable light effect photograph's when your taking a picture?
I know that if there's enough radition that it can effect film.
But if there's a small amount of nonvible light like ultraviolet or infrared could it be possible for it have an effect on flim.Woul it also be possible for it to be dected if you had the eguipment neccery?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can nonvisable light effect photograph's when your taking a picture? I know that if there's enough radition that it can effect film.
But if there's a small amount of nonvible light like ultraviolet or infrared could it be possible for it have an effect on flim.Woul it also be possible for it to be dected if you had the eguipment neccery?
Well, if there is enough the photograph would eminate black-body radiation.
 
I don't know about film, but most digital cameras pick up IR signals (not sure up to what wavelength though).

You can see this by looking at the IR transmitter on your remote control through a digital camera while pressing a button on the remote.
 
Xrays were first detected by accidental fogging of photographic paper. So yes, invisible wavelengths can effect photographic paper.

Or are you talking about digital photography?
 
Integral said:
Or are you talking about digital photography?
Both digtal and flim photography.

Could it be possible that you take a requarly photograph and use computer(or somthing) and make dectect if there was invisble light wave was exposed to the camrea.
 
scott1 said:
Can nonvisable light effect photograph's when your taking a picture?

I'm an old guy now I guess :bugeye:, but back when we still had film in a camera, if you went to take pictures in snow or something, you needed to put a UV filter in front of the lens, in order to avoid the UV to color the picture of the snow blueish.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
941
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K