Nondimensionlization of Pressure

  • Thread starter Thread starter hanson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the non-dimensionalization of pressure in fluid mechanics, specifically addressing the use of density multiplied by gravity and height (density * gravity * H) as a characteristic scale, as well as density multiplied by velocity squared (density * U^2). The latter is valid in scenarios involving dynamic pressure, particularly in high-speed flows. The Euler number is also mentioned as a dimensionless quantity relevant for pressure differences in cavitation analyses, with P_{\infinity} representing the vapor pressure of the working fluid. Resources such as Omega Engineering's poster and Wikipedia are recommended for further exploration of dimensionless numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with dimensionless numbers in fluid dynamics
  • Knowledge of pressure dynamics and hydrostatic pressure
  • Basic grasp of cavitation phenomena
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of the Euler number in fluid dynamics
  • Explore the significance of dynamic pressure in high-speed fluid flows
  • Learn about cavitation analysis techniques and their relevance in engineering
  • Study the derivation and implications of non-dimensionalization in fluid mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Fluid mechanics students, engineers involved in fluid dynamics, and researchers focusing on cavitation and pressure analysis will benefit from this discussion.

hanson
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
Hi all.
When I read through text in fluid mechanics, I see various ways of non-dimensionlising the pressure. (Please see the figure)

To me, non-dimensionlize a quantity is to make it of order unity to facilitate the mathematical processes needed afterwards.
So, I can understand why density*gravity*H is used as a characteristic scale to non-dimensionlize the pressure since it is the maximum hydrostatic pressure.

But I don't understand why density*U^2 is used to non-dimensionalize the pressure as well? In what situation is this nondimensionlization valid?

What about the P(infinity), what is it?
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    4.8 KB · Views: 517
Engineering news on Phys.org
The second two numbers are actually referred to as the Euler number (ref http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_number_(physics)). It is another dimensionless number. I don't really use it myself (I don't need to stray too much from the Reynolds number), but my handy, dandy fluids reference lists it as a useful number when dealing with pressure differences, such as in cavitation analyses. Actually, the third version you show is what is listed for a cavitation analysis (without a .5 factor) where the P is actually a reference pressure and the [tex]P_{\infinity}[/tex] is the vapor pressure of the working fluid.

Omega Engineering has a neat poster you can request that has a ton of dimensionless numbers and their uses. You can also look at a lot of them here on Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Dimensionless_numbers
 
FredGarvin said:
The second two numbers are actually referred to as the Euler number (ref http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_number_(physics)). It is another dimensionless number. I don't really use it myself (I don't need to stray too much from the Reynolds number), but my handy, dandy fluids reference lists it as a useful number when dealing with pressure differences, such as in cavitation analyses. Actually, the third version you show is what is listed for a cavitation analysis (without a .5 factor) where the P is actually a reference pressure and the [tex]P_{\infinity}[/tex] is the vapor pressure of the working fluid.

Omega Engineering has a neat poster you can request that has a ton of dimensionless numbers and their uses. You can also look at a lot of them here on Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Dimensionless_numbers

Thanks. But why density * U^2 is used to non-dimensionlize the pressure? I don't understand the rationale behind...
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K