Nonstandard Concave Mirror Optics, beyond the parabola.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effectiveness of parabolic mirrors compared to other concave shapes in focusing light. It raises questions about the properties of third-order mirrors and their lack of a uniform focal point, suggesting that light beams reflecting off such mirrors would not converge effectively. The conversation explores whether alternative shapes could achieve a focal point despite multiple reflections, concluding that they cannot consistently direct all rays to the same point. The argument emphasizes that without a parabolic shape, displaced rays will miss the focal point after reflections. Ultimately, the consensus is that only parabolic mirrors can ensure all rays converge at a single focal point.
xlearsi31
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Why is the parabola the most bent, concave, effective mirror?
What are some properties of a third order mirror (absolute value of x^3)? There is no uniform focal point. Shouldn't shining a light beam along a normal to the x-axis reflect off of the function multiple times?
Then take this to the nth order. Or make it exponential.
Does the result of the light beam end up converging to a "focal point" after all of its consecutive reflections?
Just some things I am curious about.
Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
If I understand the question, you want to know if some other shape could produce light focussed at a point, albeit with some of the rays taking multiple reflections.
No.
Suppose there were such a point, F. Consider a light ray arriving parallel to the axis and eventually going through F. Now consider a neighbouring axis-parallel ray, just displaced a fraction from the first one. If the mirror is not locally a parabola, this will, after the same number of reflections, just miss F. OK, maybe you get lucky and it passes through F after some more reflections. So now look at a ray halfway between, etc. It's pretty clear that you cannot continuously displace rays and have them all coming through the same point, no two using the same number of reflections.
 
Thanks.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top