Normal distribution + calculation of Z values

JamesGoh
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
For a normal distribution with E[x]=0 and Var(X)=1, how do we determine the Z-value of a particular percentage ?

i.e. if the percentage is 5%, how do we know that Z(5%)= 1.645 ?

is there a calculation involved or do we get it from observing the x-axis of the normal distribution ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are tables of the error function (integral of normal) for mean 0 and variance 1. These have been constructed by numerical integration. For a particular value, just look it up.

Google "normal distribution table".
 
A nice rule to remember too, is the "1-2-3 rule" aka 68-95-99.7 rule:

In a normal distribution, 68% of the data is within 1σ of the mean ,

(so that, by symmetry, 34% is right of the mean and 34% is left- of the mean)

95% of the data is within 2σ, and 99.7% of all data is within 3σ of μ.

Also, using the fact that the normal distribution is symmetric also simplifies

a lot of other calculations.

Notice an approximation for your 5% question: you know that the percentile for

the mean ; z(μ)=0 , is 50-percentile. Then, by symmetry, the value σ=1 gives

you the 84th percentile. Now, z=2 would give you the 97.5th percentile--

too far. So 95th percentile is somewhere between z=1 and z=2 . More

advanced tricks will allow you to zone-in more carefully, but this is a nice

rule- of- thumb.
 
To add to this question itself. I have a CDF so a column of 19 values. [0.05, 0.1, 0.15...0.95] and i have the corresponding x values [779, 784, 793...877 ]...again 19 values

When i plot graphically each other, it gives a smooth CDF following a normal curve however i am not sure if its normal, how do u derive if its normal since i do not have the random numbers.

Also I made a PDF formula for these values with d(CDF)/dx which means...(cdf2-cdf1)/(x2-x1) as coming from various textbooks. Is it right?

How do i generate Standard deviation from such a CDF?? Currently thinking that as 95% data is under 4σ area...[x(95) - x(5)]/4 will approximately give me the Standard deviation...Can someone suggest me the right way here
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Back
Top