Normal force in man-on-ladder torque questions?

AI Thread Summary
In torque problems involving a man on a ladder, the only force providing torque is the man's weight (mg), while the normal force (Fn) exerted by the ladder on the man is equal and opposite, resulting in no net torque. The normal force is balanced by the weight of the man, leading to a net force of zero when the man is steady. This principle also applies to other scenarios, such as a man on a plank, where static friction and normal force must balance the weight. Understanding these forces clarifies why Fn isn't included in torque calculations for this specific situation. Overall, recognizing the balance of forces is crucial in analyzing torque in such problems.
miaou5
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



fbf5dbf9-e186-4e6c-9e41-a7854f1a7bf7.png


This is just a more generalized question, and not really about a specific value. The question was regarding torque, and had a man standing on a ladder like so. The only force (exerted by the man on the ladder) that provided torque was indicated to be mg, but I don’t really understand—why isn’t Fn included? Obviously there is a downwards Fn exerted by the man on the ladder, so why doesn’t the diagram account for that? (I’m a bit confused since in loop-the-loop roller coaster problems, we always have to account for downwards Fn.)

Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good question! The man stands on a step of the ladder which is (hopefully) horizontal. He exerts some normal force FN on that step. The step acts with the same force, but in opposite direction on the man. Gravity also acts on the man. The man is steady, so the resultant force on him is zero. That means FN-mg=0, FN=mg. At the end, the man exerts a force, equal to its weight, on the ladder.

ehild
 
Here's another way to think about it. It needn't be a ladder; it could just be a plank, provided there is enough static friction that the man does not slide. In this case there would be a normal force, and a frictional force up the plank. But since these have to be balanced exactly by the vertical weight of the man, their resultant is vertical.
 
I get it now! Thanks so much to both of you. Whew, thinking about these things can be a real doozy sometimes :-p
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top