Normal force in man-on-ladder torque questions?

AI Thread Summary
In torque problems involving a man on a ladder, the only force providing torque is the man's weight (mg), while the normal force (Fn) exerted by the ladder on the man is equal and opposite, resulting in no net torque. The normal force is balanced by the weight of the man, leading to a net force of zero when the man is steady. This principle also applies to other scenarios, such as a man on a plank, where static friction and normal force must balance the weight. Understanding these forces clarifies why Fn isn't included in torque calculations for this specific situation. Overall, recognizing the balance of forces is crucial in analyzing torque in such problems.
miaou5
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



fbf5dbf9-e186-4e6c-9e41-a7854f1a7bf7.png


This is just a more generalized question, and not really about a specific value. The question was regarding torque, and had a man standing on a ladder like so. The only force (exerted by the man on the ladder) that provided torque was indicated to be mg, but I don’t really understand—why isn’t Fn included? Obviously there is a downwards Fn exerted by the man on the ladder, so why doesn’t the diagram account for that? (I’m a bit confused since in loop-the-loop roller coaster problems, we always have to account for downwards Fn.)

Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good question! The man stands on a step of the ladder which is (hopefully) horizontal. He exerts some normal force FN on that step. The step acts with the same force, but in opposite direction on the man. Gravity also acts on the man. The man is steady, so the resultant force on him is zero. That means FN-mg=0, FN=mg. At the end, the man exerts a force, equal to its weight, on the ladder.

ehild
 
Here's another way to think about it. It needn't be a ladder; it could just be a plank, provided there is enough static friction that the man does not slide. In this case there would be a normal force, and a frictional force up the plank. But since these have to be balanced exactly by the vertical weight of the man, their resultant is vertical.
 
I get it now! Thanks so much to both of you. Whew, thinking about these things can be a real doozy sometimes :-p
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top