Normal mode and eigenfrequency

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between eigenfrequencies and normal modes in mechanical systems. Normal modes refer to the eigenvectors obtained from solving the secular equation, while eigenfrequencies are the corresponding eigenvalues. For a system like two masses on springs, the functions describing their motion are the normal modes, and each mode has an associated eigenfrequency. Additionally, a question about transverse frequency arises, relating to systems oscillating under electromagnetic radiation, such as light. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing oscillatory systems in physics.
kaksmet
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between eigenfriquency and normal mode? If, for example, I solve the secular equation (from the equations of motion) for a mechanical system (say two masses on springs) to obtain the eigenvalues I thought I got the normal modes, but now I am told I get the eigenfrequencies..`?

Thanks for any help to enlighten me on this matter.

/K
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The normal modes are the eigenvectors, the eigenvalues are what are also known as eigenfrequencies. Example Af=wf, where A is your operator (could be differential like d/dx etc), f is a function, w is the eigenvalue/eigenfrequency. If you solve this to find the functional form of f, then you have obtained the normal modes or eigenvectors as theyre also known. For each function f you find, you will also get a value of w...f1:w1, f2:w2 etc, these values of w are the eigenfrequencies.

So for the equations for two masses on a spring, the functions that describe the motion of the masses, and their amplitudes of vibration are your normal modes . To each of these normal modes will correspond a frequency of vibration, the eigenfrequency.
 
nice explanation
 
hey

It nice explanation :-)

I hve question.. what about the Transverse frequency, which systems ossillate if some electromagnetic radiations (e.g light) shines on the material.

Best regards
Abid
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top