Normal Subgroups intersection = <e>

kathrynag
Messages
595
Reaction score
0
Let H and K be normal subgroups of G such that H intersect K=<e>. Show that hk=kh for all h in H and k in K.
H and K are normal so ghg^-1 is in H and gkg^-1 is in K.
want to show hk=kh. So basically I'm showing this is abelian.
Can I do ghg^-1=gkg^-1?
ghg^-1g=gkg^-1g
gh=gk
so that works if g=h
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let h\in\ H with h\neq e, and let k\in\ K with k\neq e.

Then what can you say about khk^{-1}?
 
kathrynag said:
Let H and K be normal subgroups of G such that H intersect K=<e>. Show that hk=kh for all h in H and k in K.
H and K are normal so ghg^-1 is in H and gkg^-1 is in K.
want to show hk=kh. So basically I'm showing this is abelian.
Can I do ghg^-1=gkg^-1?
ghg^-1g=gkg^-1g
gh=gk
so that works if g=h

Hi kathrynag! :smile:

I don't see how what you did could be correct.

When showing commutativity it is often useful to look at the commutator.
The commutator of h and k is [h,k]=hkh-1k-1.
If the commutator of h and k is equal to e, than h and k commute (why?).

Suppose you write hk=k1h, which should be true for some k1 in K.
What do you get?
 
Oh, I just noticed that this is a pretty old thread.
I suspect that the OP is not interested in the answer anymore. :wink:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top