I Normalization and the probability amplitude

redtree
Messages
335
Reaction score
15
Given two probability amplitude wavefunctions, one in position space ##\psi(r,k)## and one in wavenumber space ##\phi(r,k)##, where ##r## and ##k## are Fourier conjugates, how is it possible for the modulus squared, i.e., probability density, of BOTH wavefunctions to be normalized? It seems that only one of the two probability densities can be normalized, and one must choose to normalize in either position OR wavenumber space. Is my understanding correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
redtree said:
Given two probability amplitude wavefunctions, one in position space ##\psi(r,k)## and one in wavenumber space ##\phi(r,k)##, where ##r## and ##k## are Fourier conjugates, how is it possible for the modulus squared, i.e., probability density, of BOTH wavefunctions to be normalized? It seems that only one of the two probability densities can be normalized, and one must choose to normalize in either position OR wavenumber space. Is my understanding correct?

On the contrary, the norm of a wavefunction is the same whether you normalize in position space or momentum (wavenumber) space.

I don't know what you mean by ##\psi(r,k)##. Let's simplify to one spatial dimension, so a wave function is just a function ##\psi(x)## in position space. Then the corresponding representation in momentum space, ##\tilde{\psi}(k)## is defined by:

##\tilde{\psi}(k) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int e^{-ikx} \psi(x) dx##. Then the norms are the same:

##\int (\psi(x))^* \psi(x) dx = \int (\tilde{\psi}(k))^* \tilde{\psi}(k) dk##
 
Assume the probability density is the normalized Gaussian, such that:
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
\left|\phi(x) \right|^2&=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi \sigma^2}} e^{-\frac{x^2}{2 \sigma^2}}
\end{split}
\end{equation}

Thus:
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi \sigma^2}} e^{-\frac{x^2}{2 \sigma^2}}&=1
\end{split}
\end{equation}Where:
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
\mathcal{F}\left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi \sigma^2}} e^{-\frac{x^2}{2 \sigma^2}}\right]&=e^{-2 \pi^2 \sigma^2 k^2}
\end{split}
\end{equation}

However:
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk
e^{-2 \pi^2 \sigma^2 k^2}&=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi \sigma^2}}
\\
&\text{i.e., } <>1
\end{split}
\end{equation}

So what am I missing?
 
You don't take the Fourier transform of the square of the function, you take the Fourier transform of the function, and then square it.

So your function is ##\phi(x) = (2\pi \sigma^2)^{-\frac{1}{4}} e^{-\frac{x^2}{4\sigma^2}}##

Then ##\tilde{\phi}(k) = (2\pi \sigma^2)^{-\frac{1}{4}} (2\pi)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \int e^{-\frac{x^2}{4\sigma^2} } e^{-ikx} dx = (2\pi)^{-\frac{3}{4}} (\sigma)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \int e^{-\frac{x^2}{4\sigma^2} } e^{-ikx} dx##

To do the integral, let ##x = 2\sigma y + i \sigma k##. Then ##e^{-\frac{x^2}{4\sigma^2} } e^{-ikx} = e^{-(y+ik \sigma)^2 - \sigma^2 k^2}##

So ##(2\pi)^{-\frac{3}{4}} (\sigma)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \int e^{-\frac{x^2}{4\sigma^2} } e^{-ikx} dx = (2\pi)^{-\frac{3}{4}} (\sigma)^{-\frac{1}{2}} 2 \sigma e^{-\sigma^2 k^2} \sqrt{\pi}##

So

##\tilde{\phi}(k) = (\frac{2\sigma^2}{\pi})^{\frac{1}{4}} e^{-\sigma^2 k^2}##

Square it to get the probability density:

##|\tilde{\phi}(k)|^2 = (\frac{2\sigma^2}{\pi})^{\frac{1}{2}} e^{-2\sigma^2 k^2}##

You'll find that ##\int |\tilde{\phi}(k)|^2 dk = 1##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PeroK
stevendaryl said:
##|\tilde{\phi}(k)|^2 = (\frac{2\sigma^2}{\pi})^{\frac{1}{2}} e^{-2\sigma^2 k^2}##

It occurs to me that "wave number" might not be the same thing as my ##k##. It might be defined so that ##k \equiv 2\pi k'## where ##k'## is the wave number. If that's the case, then the density as a function of ##k'## must be adjusted.
 
Got it; I figured I was making a simple mistake. I use ##e^{-2 \pi i k x}## instead of ##e^{-i k x}## for the Fourier transform so my answer a little different but normalizes just the same. Thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Back
Top