Normalization of Radial wavefunction of hydrogen atom

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 13K views · last reply
Arafat Sagar
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
All I need to evaluate the normalization coefficient. I need a step by step guide. It will be a great help if someone please tell me where can i get the solution (with intermediate steps). I think the solution can be done using the orthogonal properties of associated Laguerre polynomial. I need the steps. Thanks.
 
Attachments
  • Typeset equations for the hydrogen radial wavefunction: associated Laguerre polynomial as a sum over j with factorials, then R_nl(r) = N_nl (2r/na)^l e^(-r/na) L(2r/na), and N_nl = 1 over the square root of the integral of r^2 R_nl^2 dr.
    NormHydRad.png
    4.6 KB · Views: 5,553
Physics news on Phys.org
thanks a lot. the book contains the solution. but i still have one more confusion. the radial wavefunction (normalized) in the book has a minus sign. but i found many places where the minus sign has not been included. though the probability density requires the mod square of ψ, i want to know the shape of ψ. hence, what is the real value of it? should i include minus sign?
 
Attachments
  • Formula for the normalized hydrogen radial wavefunction R_nl(r) = ±(2/na)^(3/2) times a square root of (n−l−1)!/([(n+l)!]^3 (2n)) times (2r/na)^l e^(−r/na) times a sum over j from 2l+1 to n+l of (−1)^j (n+l)!/(j!(n+l−j)!(j−2l−1)!) times (2r/na)^(j−2l−1).
    radWavfunc.png
    10 KB · Views: 1,085
Wavefunctions are always uncertain up to a phase. So you can multiply the wavefunction by -1, or in fact by any number of the form exp(i * phi) where phi is any real value, without changing any observables.
 
i have an equation,
f(ρ) = [itex]\rho^{l+1}[/itex][itex]e^{-\rho}[/itex][itex]\upsilon(2\rho)[/itex]

i want to transform it to the following multiplying only the right hand side with [itex](-1)^{2l+1}[/itex][itex](2)^{l+1}[/itex],
f(ρ) = [itex](-1)^{2l+1}[/itex][itex](2\rho)^{l+1}[/itex][itex]e^{-\rho}[/itex][itex]\upsilon(2\rho)[/itex]

is it possible?

i want to use [itex](2\rho)^{l+1}[/itex] instead of [itex]\rho^{l+1}[/itex], because, the normalization coefficient normalizes with respect to ρ whatever the the function f(ρ) is. and [itex](2)^{l+1}[/itex] is not a function of ρ.

i want to multiply by [itex](-1)^{2l+1}[/itex], because i found that if the associated Laguerre polynomial is [itex]AL^{2l+1}_{n+l}(x)[/itex]=[itex]\frac{d^{2l+1}}{dx^{2l+1}}[/itex][itex]L^{}_{n+l}(x)[/itex]. now, in some places, i found A=1 and other places [itex]A=(-1)^{2l+1}[/itex]. besides, is it something related to Condon-Shortley Phase factor?
as after multiplyng by anything which is not a function of [itex]\rho[/itex] will still satisfy the associated laguerre differential equation, can i do this multiplication of [itex](-1)^{2l+1}[/itex][itex](2)^{l+1}[/itex]? thanks.
 
Last edited: