Normalization of Radial wavefunction of hydrogen atom

Arafat Sagar
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
All I need to evaluate the normalization coefficient. I need a step by step guide. It will be a great help if someone please tell me where can i get the solution (with intermediate steps). I think the solution can be done using the orthogonal properties of associated Laguerre polynomial. I need the steps. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • NormHydRad.png
    NormHydRad.png
    4.6 KB · Views: 5,474
Physics news on Phys.org
thanks a lot. the book contains the solution. but i still have one more confusion. the radial wavefunction (normalized) in the book has a minus sign. but i found many places where the minus sign has not been included. though the probability density requires the mod square of ψ, i want to know the shape of ψ. hence, what is the real value of it? should i include minus sign?
 

Attachments

  • radWavfunc.png
    radWavfunc.png
    10 KB · Views: 1,034
Wavefunctions are always uncertain up to a phase. So you can multiply the wavefunction by -1, or in fact by any number of the form exp(i * phi) where phi is any real value, without changing any observables.
 
i have an equation,
f(ρ) = \rho^{l+1}e^{-\rho}\upsilon(2\rho)

i want to transform it to the following multiplying only the right hand side with (-1)^{2l+1}(2)^{l+1},
f(ρ) = (-1)^{2l+1}(2\rho)^{l+1}e^{-\rho}\upsilon(2\rho)

is it possible?

i want to use (2\rho)^{l+1} instead of \rho^{l+1}, because, the normalization coefficient normalizes with respect to ρ whatever the the function f(ρ) is. and (2)^{l+1} is not a function of ρ.

i want to multiply by (-1)^{2l+1}, because i found that if the associated Laguerre polynomial is AL^{2l+1}_{n+l}(x)=\frac{d^{2l+1}}{dx^{2l+1}}L^{}_{n+l}(x). now, in some places, i found A=1 and other places A=(-1)^{2l+1}. besides, is it something related to Condon-Shortley Phase factor?
as after multiplyng by anything which is not a function of \rho will still satisfy the associated laguerre differential equation, can i do this multiplication of (-1)^{2l+1}(2)^{l+1}? thanks.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top