Normalizing a Wavefunction of a harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around normalizing the wavefunction of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, specifically the combination of the ground and first excited state wavefunctions. Participants are exploring the normalization process and the implications for calculating probabilities associated with the states.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to normalize the wavefunction and are questioning their calculations, particularly regarding the normalization constant and the integration process. There are discussions about the orthogonality of the eigenfunctions and how it affects the normalization.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the normalization process, suggesting that the original poster should show intermediate steps and consider the orthogonality of the eigenfunctions. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct approach to squaring the wavefunction and integrating it.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the correct normalization constant and the interpretation of the results, with participants noting that the combined probabilities should equal one. The discussion includes a focus on the definitions and properties of the wavefunctions involved.

Bready
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
1. At a certain time the wavefunction of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator is

\psi(x) = 3\phi0(x) + 4\phi1(x)

where \phi0(x) and \phi1(x) are normalized energy eigenfunctions of the ground and first excited states respectively. Normalize the wavefunction and determine the probability of finding the oscillator in the ground state.




3. I'm not really sure if I'm normalizing the wavefunction correctly, I get the normalizing constant as 1/7. However, when I calculate the probability of the ground state and first state combined they don't equal one. Aren't they supposed to and have I normalized correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bready said:
I'm not really sure if I'm normalizing the wavefunction correctly, I get the normalizing constant as 1/7.
Redo this. What's the definition of normalization? (What must equal 1?)
 
I've got the equation for normalising a wavefunction; one over the square root of the wavefunction squared.


= (\int[3\phi0(x) + 4\phi1(x)]2)1/2 =

I still get \sqrt{1/49} when I should be getting \sqrt{1/25}; I think I'm squaring the function wrong. The coefficients I get upon squaring are (9 + 12 + 12 + 16), I'm guessing the 12s cancel each other out to leave 9+16=25 but I don't see how. Do I need to know the energy eigenfunctions to calculate this? I think I'm getting myself confused, can you point me in the right direction of squaring the wavefunction? It's just all previous examples I have give the wavefunction experssed as a single function rather than an addition of two. Thanks very much.
 
show your intermediate steps.

I think you are forgetting that phi_0 and phi_2 are ortogonal to each other..
 
Bready said:
I'm guessing the 12s cancel each other out to leave 9+16=25 but I don't see how. Do I need to know the energy eigenfunctions to calculate this?
All you need to know is:
malawi_glenn said:
I think you are forgetting that phi_0 and phi_2 are ortogonal to each other..
That's the secret. :wink:

Show your steps, keeping the eigenfunctions in your expansion.
 
psi(x) = 3phi_0(x) + 4phi_1(x)

=> [psi(x)]^2 = [3phi_0(x) + 4phi_1(x)]^2

=> [9(phi_0(x))^2 + 12phi*_0(x)phi_1(x) + 12phi_0(x)phi*_1(x) + 16(phi_1(x))^2

Is this right?

When I integrate with limits +-infinity does it give

9+0+0+16?
 
Good! Now you've got it.
 
Thanks very much! :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K