Normalizing wave function, factor of 2 out

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around normalizing the wave function Ψ(x, t) = Ae^{-\lambda|x|}e^{-i\omega t}. The key point is the calculation of the squared magnitude, where the user initially believes there is a missing factor of 2 in the expression for |\Psi(x, t)|^{2}. It is clarified that the factor of 2 arises from changing the limits of integration from -infinity to +infinity to 0 to +infinity, allowing the use of a definite integral. The model solution was poorly written, leading to confusion, but the user ultimately understands the normalization process. The discussion highlights the importance of careful consideration of integration limits in wave function normalization.
Frinkz
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the wave function

\Psi(x, t) = Ae^{-\lambda|x|}e^{-i\omega t}

where A, \lambda and \omega are positive real constants.

Normalize \Psi

Homework Equations


\int |\Psi(x, t)|^{2} dx = 1

|\Psi(x, t)|^{2} = \Psi^{*}\Psi

The Attempt at a Solution


I have a model solution - with a step missing, I think my error is in complex conjugate math...

1, Finding |\Psi(x, t)|^{2}

\Psi^{*}\Psi = (Ae^{-\lambda|x|}e^{i\omega t}) (Ae^{-\lambda|x|}e^{-i\omega t})

= A^{2}e^{-2\lambda|x|}e^{i\omega t}e^{-i\omega t}
= A^{2}e^{-2\lambda|x|}e^{0} = A^{2}e^{-2\lambda|x|}

I think this is where my problem is, I am told that

|\Psi(x, t)|^{2} = 2|A|^{2}e^{-2\lambda|x|}So I am missing a factor of 2?

Is there a complex conjugate rule somewhere I am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your steps looks fine to me, I am not sure from where they got the factor of 2?.. and there is no other complex conjugate rule you miss ..

is their answer says that psi^2 is after obtaining the normalized wavefunction? or is it just the step that follows the one you did ?..
 
Thanks for checking.


Turns out, the model answers were a bit badly written.


They had put in the factor of two, because the integral was changed from -infinity to +infinity, to 0 to +infinity, so you can make use of a definite integral

\int_0^{\infty} \! e^{-\lambda x} = \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{\lambda}}

That step was just omitted from the solution I was trying to understand, but I get it now :)
 
Sorry, that was a typo.

Should have been e^(-lambda x^2)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top