Not homework, but question about pushing over a heavy slab at rest

  • Thread starter Thread starter wildside50
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework Rest
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force required to push over a large granite slab, considering its dimensions and weight. A torque analysis was attempted, using the slab's thickness as the radius and resulting in a high torque value, suggesting a significant force is needed to tip the slab. The calculations indicate that even with varying thickness, the force required remains substantial, raising questions about the slab's stability. Key factors include the slab's mass and the lever arm height, which affect the torque generated when pushing. Ultimately, while the numbers seem large, the discussion suggests that a human might still be able to tip the slab under certain conditions.
wildside50
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So the concept is, you've got a very large slab of stone. For arguments sake, let's say it's about 8 feet high, 4 feet across, and 2 feet thick. How much force would it take to push the slab over, pushing at the top for maximum torque. If granite weighs about 165 lbs/cubic ft, would a human be able to push this object over? How about if it was only 1 foot thick, or 6" thick?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried some things using torque but I think I was way off. I took one of the bottom edges as the point of rotation and using the thickness of the slab as the radius, and multiplying by the force of gravity, I got a torque, namely 9.8m/s * 4800 kg * .6 m, and used that resulting torque as the required torque to oppose gravity and rotate the object about that edge. That resulted in a very large # of 28224 N*m. This torque I then set equal to the unknown force time the height of slab (the new rotational edge) getting F = 28224 N*m / 2.4 m = 11760 N. That seems huge. That means even if the object were 100 feet tall and still weighed the same, it would take 940 N of force to tip it. Or if the base was 6" instead of 2', it would still take 2987 N. That still seems like a big number, as in my mind a 100 ft tall object with a 2 ft base would be highly unstable. Am I taking a completely wrong approach to sovling this or are those #'s right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Another thing to keep in mind is that there will be a point of thickness will be too great, and the object will simply slide rather than tip over. Additionally, as you have noted, the less thickness there is the easier it will be to push the slab over, which is due to less mass and less points of contact for frictional effects opposing you pushing the slab over.

Here are things at work:
1) The mass of the object. It is easier to push a less massive object than a more massive object. Granite is very dense and will become to massive for a human pretty quick. Imagine the opposite scenario, of say paper, and the dimensional effects are easy to visualize.
2) The lever arm height. "Give me a lever long enough and I will move the world." (Or something like that.) The further away from the pivot you can push, the more torque you will get.

I don't really want to work out the numbers, but 8 feet high will give a pretty good lever arm compared to the two feet of thickness. I think it is possible for a human to be able to do it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top