Not sure this is the right thread for this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Schrodinger's Dog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thread
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential unification of magnetism, gravity, and the strong and weak forces, sparked by an article in New Scientist about ongoing experiments related to this theory. There is skepticism about its validity, but interest from organizations like NASA suggests some level of seriousness in the scientific community. Participants express a desire for accessible explanations without heavy mathematics, indicating a broader audience's engagement with the topic. The conversation reflects a mix of excitement and caution regarding the implications of such a unification in physics. Overall, the theory is seen as a potentially groundbreaking yet uncertain development in understanding fundamental forces.
Schrodinger's Dog
Messages
835
Reaction score
7
A general unification of magnetism&gravity and Strong and weak forces?

http://www.heim-theory.com/

Saw an article in New scientist about this theory and how it's being experimented on as we speak? Is there anything to it, or is it a flight of fancy? I'm sure someone has some knowledge of this theory, even apparently NASA are interested in it? What do you think?

If your going to debunk it, please no heavy maths, Don't think my calculus skills could handle it:smile:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Thanks, if this is not just a pipe dream, it would be extremely exciting, I'll leave interpreting the math until I've studied a bit more, for now I'll take their intepratations on board:smile:
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top