Not sure which formula to use Deals with work and position

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by a one-dimensional force on a particle with a given position formula. Participants clarify that to find the force, the second derivative of the position function should be used to determine acceleration, as the force is not constant. The work-energy theorem is suggested as a more straightforward approach, focusing on the change in kinetic energy rather than using the work formula for variable forces. After several calculations and corrections, the final work done is determined to be -641 J, indicating that the work is negative due to the particle's deceleration. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying initial and final velocities in the calculations.
iJamJL
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A one-dimensional force acts on a particle of mass m = 6.26 kg in such a way that its position is given by:

x = 0.484t3 - 33.6t

Find W, the work done by this force during the first 1.49 s.

Homework Equations


F=mg
F=ma
W=F*distance

The Attempt at a Solution


To find the distance, I plugged in 1.49 into the formula they gave, and I got (-48.5). I know that to find work, the formula is W=F*s, so in order to find the force, I'm not sure which formula to use.

I think I should be using F=ma, and to find the acceleration, I can take the second derivative of the given formula. However, I forget whether that is allowed in one-dimension. If not, then do I use F=mg? If I use F=mg, then the answer for work will come out positive. If I use F=ma, then the work comes out negative.

Here are my results:

W=Fs
W=ma*s
W=6.26*18.18*(-48.5)
W=(-5519.6)JW=Fs
W=mg*s
W=6.26*(-9.81)*(-48.5)
W=2978.4 J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
to find the acceleration, I can take the second derivative of the given formula.
Yes! Do that and you will find that the acceleration varies with time so you can't use W=Fs; instead you have to integrate F*ds.

Gravity is not involved in this. It would cause a constant acceleration and a distance formula of s = Vi*t + .5*a*t² rather than the cubic formula of this problem.
 
hi iJamJL! :smile:
iJamJL said:
I think I should be using F=ma, and to find the acceleration, I can take the second derivative of the given formula. However, I forget whether that is allowed in one-dimension. If not, then do I use F=mg?

if you need to find the force, then yes you use F = ma

and yes the acceleration is the second derviative, even in three dimensions! :smile:

(what is worrying you about that? :confused:)
To find the distance, I plugged in 1.49 into the formula they gave, and I got (-48.5). I know that to find work, the formula is W=F*s, so in order to find the force, I'm not sure which formula to use.

yes, that does give you the total distance

but W = F*s only works if F is constant

here, F isn't constant, so you would have to use W = ∫ F.ds

however it might be simpler to use the work-energy theorem, and calculate the difference in kinetic energy :wink:
 
Thanks for the replies!

tiny-tim said:
however it might be simpler to use the work-energy theorem, and calculate the difference in kinetic energy :wink:

I didn't realize that until you pointed it out! I tried it out, but I think I made a mistake somewhere. Here's what I did:

To find the final velocity, which for this case is at 1.49s, we take the first derivative at 1.49:
x = 0.484t3 - 33.6t
dx/dt= 2*(.484)t^2 - 33.6
v= (-30.38)m/s

W=ΔKE
W= 1/2*m(v-final^2) - 1/2*m(v-initial^2)
**v-initial is 0 because t=0, x=0**
W=1/2*6.26*(-30.38)^2
W=2888.8 J

I tried entering that into my online homework system and it came out wrong. The system doesn't really care for the form that the answer is, as long as there are 3 significant digits. That means that I solved for this incorrectly! :cry:
 
iJamJL said:
x = 0.484t3 - 33.6t
dx/dt= 2*(.484)t^2 - 33.

erm :redface:3*t2 :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
erm :redface:3*t2 :wink:

lol I wrote that on my scrap paper, but typed and calculated it incorrectly!

My end result came to:

v=(.484)*3*(1.49^2) - 33.6
=(-30.4)m/s

W=1/2*m*v^2
W=1/2*6.26*(-30.4^2)
W=2892.6 J

That's still coming out as incorrect.
 
iJamJL said:
W=1/2*m*v^2

no, W = 1/2*m*v22 - 1/2*m*v12 :rolleyes:
 
iJamJL said:
Thanks for the replies!



I didn't realize that until you pointed it out! I tried it out, but I think I made a mistake somewhere. Here's what I did:

To find the final velocity, which for this case is at 1.49s, we take the first derivative at 1.49:
x = 0.484t3 - 33.6t
dx/dt= 2*(.484)t^2 - 33.6
v= (-30.38)m/s

W=ΔKE
W= 1/2*m(v-final^2) - 1/2*m(v-initial^2)
**v-initial is 0 because t=0, x=0**
Just because t=0 and x=0, that does not imply that v(0) = 0. Plug t=0 into your velocity formula.
 
tiny-tim said:
no, W = 1/2*m*v22 - 1/2*m*v12 :rolleyes:

Wow, I'm bad at this. I initially thought that v-initial would be 0, but then I looked back and realized it's not. *facepalm*

v(0)=(-33.6)m/s
v(1.49)=(-30.4)m/s

W=1/2*m*(v2^2) - 1/2*m*(v1^2)
W=1/2*6.26(-30.4^2) - 1/2*6.26*(-33.6^2)
W=2892.6 - 3533.6
W=(-641) J

Did I finally get the correct answer? :approve:
 
Back
Top