Notation of mass number of an element

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the representation of mass numbers and atomic numbers in chemical notation. There is a discrepancy in how these numbers are displayed, with some sources showing the mass number as a left superscript and others as a right superscript. The conventional notation is to place the mass number as a left superscript and the atomic number (Z) as a right subscript, exemplified by the format ^{137}_{55}Cs. While the atomic number is often omitted when the element symbol is used, including it can aid in understanding nuclear reactions. The conversation highlights that multiple formats exist, but the standard notation is preferred for clarity in scientific communication.
Paradox101
Messages
47
Reaction score
1
In a lot of books I have seen the mass number of an element being written on left superscript of its chemical symbol,while my professor and other teachers write it in right superscript.However, it is written at the bottom of the symbol in the periodic table.Which is/are correct, or are all correct but different ways to represent the same thing?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
It should be - ^{137}_{\phantom{0}55}\mathrm{Cs} - that is, mass number on the top, Z (nucleus charge) on the bottom. Generally speaking Z is not necessary when the element symbol is used, but it still makes following teh nuclear reaction equations easier.
 
Thanks
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top