Nuclear reactions in AGN accretion disk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the properties of accretion disks around black holes, noting that they consist of atomic material with high orbital velocities and density, yet remain cooler than expected due to smooth particle interactions. The participants question whether current models of accretion disks align with these observations, acknowledging that there is no consensus on a definitive model. They explore the possibility of nuclear fusion occurring in the inner regions of the disk, concluding that the disk's density is insufficient for fusion to take place. While white dwarfs can experience fusion bursts, the absence of a solid surface in black holes prevents similar reactions. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities and uncertainties surrounding accretion disk dynamics and fusion potential.
gleb
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
As I understand it, it's all atomic material in the accretion disk of a big black hole, with very high orbital velocities and high density. However, the the disk is quite flat, and cooler than one would think with the velocities involved, because the material is swirling in smoothly, with individual particles having fairly tame velocities relative to nearby particles.

Now, I have two questions, really. First, does my understanding of the very basic properties of accretion disks agree with the currently accepted models? And second, is it possible for fusion to occur in the inner area of the disk? I know that the temperature of the gas is only on the order of x-ray emission, too cool for fusion, but what if there was some sort of perturbation in the disk, something that disrupted it's very smooth inward spiral. To me it seems like with the densities and energies involved, it would be a good environment for nuclear fusion. So, is there any merit to this idea?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It would depend on the size of the black hole and the density of the material in the accretion disc. White dwarfs can have bursts of surface fusion if fed from a companion star so I see no reasons why some black holes will not have fusion explosions in ther accretion discs. They can also disrupt stars by tidal stretching and possibly expose fusion areas.

The bigger the black hole gets the "softer" and less likely that events like this will happen as it accretes
 
gleb said:
Now, I have two questions, really. First, does my understanding of the very basic properties of accretion disks agree with the currently accepted models?

Which one? Unfortunately, we don't have a consensus accretion disk model at the moment. The situation you describe is consistent with simplest "thin disk" models that don't involve MHD or radiation pressure.


And second, is it possible for fusion to occur in the inner area of the disk?

The disk itself isn't dense enough to undergo nuclear fusion. Novae (runaway fusion reactions) can occur when disk material impacts the degenerate surface of a white dwarf, but the lack of a surface means you won't get this behavior with a black hole.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top