Nuclear Waste - Not in my back yard

  • Thread starter Thread starter AntonL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear
AI Thread Summary
Japan and the U.S. are negotiating to build an international nuclear waste storage facility in Mongolia, raising concerns about accountability for nuclear waste management. Critics argue that each country should manage its own nuclear waste instead of outsourcing the problem. The discussion highlights Finland's successful model of a permanent repository, which is designed to safely contain waste for 100,000 years. Additionally, Germany faces challenges with its low-level nuclear waste depot, illustrating the complexities of nuclear waste disposal. The conversation underscores the need for responsible and sustainable solutions to nuclear waste management.
AntonL
Messages
521
Reaction score
0
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20110509p2a00m0na017000c.html

Japan, U.S. negotiating construction of nuclear waste facility in Mongolia
Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and the U.S. Department of Energy have secretly been advancing plans to construct the world's first international storage and disposal facility for spent nuclear fuel in Mongolia, it has been learned

Is this really the way to solve the problem, the only solution is that each country should be responsible for its own waste.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Oh that's why anything in the media about Fukushima NPP and the ill effects of "radiation" is blocked. It's government money at risk in a government level money-making scheme. And the IAEA, what are they now, uranium mining consultants and salespeople?
 
Last edited:
Last edited by a moderator:
AntonL said:
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20110509p2a00m0na017000c.html

Japan, U.S. negotiating construction of nuclear waste facility in Mongolia
:rolleyes:

Is this really the way to solve the problem, the only solution is that each country should be responsible for its own waste.
Definitely. If not Nevada, the how about Wyoming?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top