Nucleus of an atom contains only neutrons and protons?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying two incorrect statements regarding atomic structure. Statement A is deemed incorrect because it oversimplifies the nucleus, which contains protons and neutrons but also virtual particles. Statement C is incorrect as it inaccurately associates the number of protons with valence electrons. Additionally, Statement E is also incorrect, as many elements, like magnesium, can have equal numbers of protons and neutrons. The consensus is that the two incorrect statements are A and E.
topsyturvy
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
thanks hootenanny:wink:

im not sure if my teacher had set this question wrongly or not? because I am finding it hard to answer.

the question goes:
TWO statement below are INCORRECT. which are these 2 statements?
A.) the nucleus of an atom contains only neutrons and protons.

B.)The mass number(nucleon number) of an atom = number of protons + number of neutrons.

C.)The Nucleus of an atom contains 3 protons and 4 neutrons. Thus, this atom has 3 valence electrons.

D.)It is possible for the mass number(nucleon number) and atomic number(proton number) of an atom to be equal.

E.)It is never possible for the number of neutrons and the number of protons to be equal.

can anybody help? :confused:
i could only pick out 1 incorrect statement which is C.
but the question require 2.. so i hope somebody could help. thanks lotsa.:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
topsyturvy said:
A.) the nucleus of an atom contains only neutrons and protons.
I'm not sure how much depth you have gone into, this is probably from chemistry class no? But this statement is technically incorrect. Protons and neutrons themselves are composed of quarks; also, in the nucleus there are many virutal particles which mediate the fundamental forces (strong, weak, EM and gravity). However, it is unlikely that you have gone into this much depth in chemistry class, but as far as I can see all the others, except (c) as you point out are correct.:confused:
 
Last edited:
i think the choice no E is also wrong in the 1st question.

eg in magnisium the no of protons is equal to no of neutrons(12)
 
benzun_1999 said:
i think the choice no E is also wrong in the 1st question.

eg in magnisium the no of protons is equal to no of neutrons(12)
Yes, I forgot to comment on this in this post, however, on my previous post I did say that;
Hootenanny said:
Yes, infact many of the elements have equal numbers of protons and neutrons. HINT: Look for elements with even nucelon numbers.
So, the obvious choices here would be C and E. Apologies for the confusion.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top