Null geodesics of light from a black hole accretion disk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation for null geodesics of light from a rotating black hole accretion disk to an observer at infinity. The key equation is d²u/dφ² = 3u² - u, where u = 1/r, and the solution involves integrating from a point of emission to infinity. Participants clarify that the second-order equation can be transformed into two first-order ODEs, which are du/dφ = p and dp/dφ = 3u² - u. The original poster expresses confusion about varying the initial gradient and determining the correct angle E for the light paths. The conversation highlights the complexities in understanding the physics of light behavior around black holes and the challenges in applying the equations correctly.
Favicon
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Sorry I don't know latex so this may look a little messy.

Homework Statement



I'm trying to solve the equation for null geodesics of light traveling from a rotating black hole accretion disk to an observer at r = infinity. The point of emission for each photon is given by co-ordinates r, phi where r is radial distance from centre of the black hole, phi is azimuthal angle around the accretion disk (phi = 0 is defined to be the tangent point). The problem is stated as follows:

"Light travels on null geodesics given by the solution of the equation

d2u/dphi2 = 3u2 - u

where u = 1/r. The full paths can be found by integrating this from u=1/rem, phiem to u = 0 (r=infinity), phi = 0. This requires varying the initial gradient (du/dphi)em = - uemtanE until the correct solution is found for an angle E = E' + theta, where E' is the 'straight line' angle, and theta is the additional deflection from lightbending as the photon travels from rem to infinity. Explore the size of theta to estimate where the straight line approximation may break down."

I've also been told that to solve the equation I need to split it into two 1st order ODEs, but I'm not sure how to do that.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm really struggling just to try and understand the description, let alone solve the equation. Please could someone explain to me what this means and how I can extract the light paths from the given equations?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Favicon said:
Sorry I don't know latex so this may look a little messy.

I learned latex when I joined Physics Forums. See

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997.
Favicon said:
I'm trying to solve the equation for null geodesics of light traveling from a rotating black hole
Favicon said:
"Light travels on null geodesics given by the solution of the equation

d2u/dphi2 = 3u2 - u

where u = 1/r.

But this equation is for null geodesics of non-rotating black holes. Is this what you want to do?
Favicon said:
I've also been told that to solve the equation I need to split it into two 1st order ODEs, but I'm not sure how to do that.

This second-order equation can be reduced to a pair of first-order equations by setting p = du/d\phi, so that dp/d\phi = d^2 u/d\phi^2. Consequently,
the second-order equation is eqiuvalent to

<br /> \begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \frac{du}{d\phi} &amp;= p \\<br /> \frac{dp}{d \phi} &amp;= 3u^2 - u.\\<br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}<br />
 
Thanks for the latex tip.

But this equation is for null geodesics of non-rotating black holes. Is this what you want to do?
Yes it probably is a non-rotating black hole. I'm actually writing a program to produce the expected line spectrum from a black hole, but the description I've been given (to explain the physics of relativistic line smearing) isn't very clear so when it talked about the motion of the accretion disk I assumed it meant the black hole itself was rotating.

\frac{du}{d\phi} = p
\frac{dp}{d\phi} = 3u^{2} - u

So now I have
\frac{du}{d\phi} = p_{em} = -u_{em}tan(E)
and have to vary E? But I still can't see how I'll know when I've found the correct value for E.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top