Number of Dimensions + Laws of Physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the laws of physics can apply in universes with more than three spatial dimensions. Lisa Randall's claim is examined, questioning if Quantum Mechanics would yield the same predictions in higher dimensions. While mathematical equations can be formulated independent of dimensionality, the loss of experimental correspondence in non-3+1 dimensions raises concerns about their validity as physical laws. The implications of gravity in higher dimensions, as suggested by String Theory, are also considered. Ultimately, the relationship between dimensionality and the laws of physics remains complex and uncertain.
StevieTNZ
Messages
1,934
Reaction score
873
Can the laws of physics work with any number of dimensions (whether they be space or time)?

That's what Lisa Randall claims, but am seeking clarity.

If so, does that mean Quantum Mechanics will still predict the same results in 5 or 6 dimensional universes, and the equations will stay the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not able to provide you a definitive answer, but your question reminded me of this minutephysics video which briefly discusses the laws of physics in relation to dimensionality:

http://bit.ly/IKjnHR
 
Interesting video... but what happens to the force of gravity if there happens to be more than 3 dimensions (as is in String Theory)? The implications described in the video say it all.
 
StevieTNZ said:
Can the laws of physics work with any number of dimensions (whether they be space or time)?
That is an interesting question. The laws of physics are a bunch of mathematical equations together with a bunch of correspondence rules between the variables in the equations and experimentally measurable quantities. You can certainly write the mathematical equations in a form which is independent of the number of dimensions. But if you then do calculations with those equations in anything other than 3+1 dimensions I think you lose the correspondence rules since we have no experimental access to other dimensions. Once you lose those correspondences I am not sure that what is left should still be called a law of physics.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Back
Top