I Number of electrons in conduction band

EmilyRuck
Messages
134
Reaction score
6
Hello!
In order to obtain the number of actual electrons in the conduction band or in a range of energies, two functions are needed:
1) the density of states for electrons in conduction band, that is the function g_c(E);
2) the Fermi probability distribution f(E) for the material at its temperature T.
(as a reference, http://ecee.colorado.edu/~bart/book/carriers.htm can be used). So, the number of electrons between the energy level E and the energy level E + dE is given by

n(E)dE = g_c(E) f(E) dE

where g_c(E) dE is the number of states between energy level E and energy level E + dE and f(E) is the probability that they are occupied.
This would work if the number of states in that range is just 1 or 0. But what if there are multiple available states?

Fermi probability distribution gives the probability that a state at a certain energy E is occupied: it is just one state. If we need to handle multiple states (like two electrons with opposite spin) at the same energy (or in the same infinitesimal interval of energies, between E and E + dE), how should we use the value of the Fermi probability for each of them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shouldn't degenerate states be taken care of in the density of states? For spin up and spin down, a factor of 2 is included in the density of states, and doesn't affect the Fermi-Dirac distribution.
 
Vagn said:
Shouldn't degenerate states be taken care of in the density of states? For spin up and spin down, a factor of 2 is included in the density of states, and doesn't affect the Fermi-Dirac distribution.

Yes, a factor of 2 is included in the density of states. My question is: if an energy level E_1 is such that (for example) f(E_1) = 0.1 and there are two possible states with opposite spins for the electrons at E = E_1: will both the states have the same 0.1 probability of being occupied? Or what else?
 
EmilyRuck said:
Yes, a factor of 2 is included in the density of states. My question is: if an energy level E_1 is such that (for example) f(E_1) = 0.1 and there are two possible states with opposite spins for the electrons at E = E_1: will both the states have the same 0.1 probability of being occupied? Or what else?
All degenerate states with energy E have the same probability of being occupied, namely f(E), no matter what the spin is.
 
  • Like
Likes EmilyRuck
Fermi-Dirac distribution f(E) gives the probability that a quantum state with energy E is occupied. So, as long as there is no symmetry breaking that lifts the degeneracy of spin up and spin down electrons, they have the same energy, thereore f(E) for spin up and spin down electrons are the same. That's why we have a factor of two. Furthermore, if there are more available states with the same energy, f(E) for all those states would be the same.
 
  • Like
Likes EmilyRuck
Ok, that's right now, so thank you both!
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top