Number of individual states with the same occupation numbers

WeiShan Ng
Messages
36
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A state of a system of many noninteracting particles can be specified by listing which particle is in which of the accessible single particle states. In each microscopic state we can identify the number of particles in a given single particle state ##k##. This number is called the occupation number, of state k and is denoted by ##n_k##.
How many individual microscopic states have the same set of occupation numbers ##n_k##?

Homework Equations


Solution given:
The number of states with the same set of ##n_k## is the number of ways the N particles can be distributed in groups of ##n_k## each. It is the combinatorial factor that expresses the fact that all N particles can be interchanged, but interchanges of particles within each group do not produce new states. Hence the number is
$$\frac{N!}{n_1!n_2! \dots n_k! \dots}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


So I tried using this equation to see if I can find the correct answer. I took a system of ##N=13## particles
$$
\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
k & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\
n_k & 3 & 2 & 1 & 4 & 3 \\
\hline
\end{array}
$$
where ##k## are the individual microscopic states and ##n_k## is their occupation numbers respectively
And when I applied the equation, I get
$$\frac{13!}{3!2!1!4!}=21621600$$ which is so far off from the number expected (2)
I must have understand the equation wrong. Can someone please explain to me how exactly does this equation work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So a couple of things:

1) I'm not sure about your problem statement. You say that k is the number of particles in a given state. This should be n_k. In occupation number representation the number operator n_k returns the number of particles in the k^{th} momentum state.

2) Are you using bosonic particles or fermionic particles? Because the statistics change depending on which; for example you can have two fermions in a state (spin up and down), and exchanging them is non trivial and creates a different wave function. For bosonic particles you can have infinitely many in a state (infinite dimensional Hilbert space) and swapping them leaves the wavefunction unchanged.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top