Number of microstates in multi-particle system

Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Find the number of accessible microstates for a multi-particle system whose energy depends on temperature as ##U = aT^n## where a is a positive constant and ##n>1##. Use the fact that
##S = \int \frac{C_v}{T}dT##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


##U = nC_vdT ##

So ##\frac{U}{n} = C_v dT = \frac{aT^n}{n}##

##S = \frac{a}{n} \int T^{n-1}dT = \frac{a(n-1)^2}{n}T^{n-2}##

##=kln(\Omega)##
Rearranging and raising both sides to the power of e gives
##\Omega = e^{\frac{a}{k}(n-1)^2T^{n-2}}##

I'm slightly suspicious of that answer and in particular of whether the internal energy U in the equation ##U=nC_vdT## is the same as the U in the question, and the n in the equation ##U=nC_vdT## is the same n as the one in the equation for energy. Because the n in the given energy equation isn't defined. Is what I've done ok?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your starting point should be the definition of ##C_v##:
$$
C_v = \frac{dU}{dT}
$$
Also, you should check that integration you did.
 
DrClaude said:
Your starting point should be the definition of ##C_v##:
$$
C_v = \frac{dU}{dT}
$$
Also, you should check that integration you did.
Because I differentiated. How ridiculous. Ok, I'll try again!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top