Number Theorems and Number Bases

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bases
AI Thread Summary
Number theorems can be true across different number bases, but some are specific to particular bases. For example, the equation (a + b)(a - b) = a^2 - b^2 holds true in any base, while properties like divisibility rules can vary. Mersenne primes appear differently in base 2 compared to base 10, illustrating that not all theorems are universally applicable. The distinction between numbers and their numeral representations is crucial, as it affects interpretations of properties like evenness and oddness. Overall, the validity of a number theorem depends on its nature rather than the base used for representation.
Euan
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am probably not phrasing this question precisely enough but ...

... are Number Theorems true regardless of the Number Base?

In particular, is any given Number Theorem that is true in Base 10 equally true in Base 2?

Thank you.

Euan
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What do you consider a number theorem to be?
 
Some things are true regardless of base. (a + b)(a - b) = a^2 - b^2 in base 2, base 10, or any other base.

Some things are true only in particular bases. Mersenne primes are all 1s in base 2 but not base 10; a number is divisible by three iff the sum of its digits is divisible by three in base 10 (and base 7, base 4, base 13, ...) but not in base 2.
 
Assuming it really is a number theorem and NOT about "numerals", then, yes, every theorem is true independent of number base.

Number base and "numerals" are how we represent numbers, not the numbers themselves.

By the way, the philospher, Friedrick Engels, co-author, with Karl Marx, of the "Communist Manifesto", was, toward the end of his life, working on applying "dialectic realism" to science and mathematics. Just how much he actually understood of mathematics, at least, can be judged by his saying that many mathematics ideas only applied to some bases. For example, the number "15" is odd in base 10, but would be written as "30", and so be even, in base 5!

In order to write that you have to have a complete misunderstanding of what "even" and "odd" mean.
 
HallsofIvy said:
By the way, the philospher, Friedrick Engels, co-author, with Karl Marx, of the "Communist Manifesto", was, toward the end of his life, working on applying "dialectic realism" to science and mathematics. Just how much he actually understood of mathematics, at least, can be judged by his saying that many mathematics ideas only applied to some bases. For example, the number "15" is odd in base 10, but would be written as "30", and so be even, in base 5!

In order to write that you have to have a complete misunderstanding of what "even" and "odd" mean.

Of course, Engels *was* a kook...
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top