Numbers if molecules for differnt velocities in gas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of the velocity distribution of gas particles described by the function f(u). It clarifies that f(u) du represents the fraction of gas molecules with speeds in the range between u and u + du, despite du being infinitesimally small. This infinitesimal value still contributes to the overall fraction of molecules, as integrating f(u) over a specified range yields the total fraction of molecules within that velocity range. Additionally, there is confusion regarding the reference to figures 5.15 and 5.16, with a need for clarification on whether these figures depict f(u) or f(u) du, as the text does not clearly specify which function is illustrated. The discussion also notes issues with accessing certain pages of the source material.
georg gill
Messages
151
Reaction score
6
http://bildr.no/view/1099870

The distribution of velocities of particles in this text is given by f(u) later in the text (the final part) they say that f(u) du gives fraction of gas molecules with speed between u and du+u. I thought that would only give a infinite small number since du is infinite small and not a fraction of the molecules?

And I also wonder about that in the next sentence they refer to a function that is drawn in figure 5.15 and 5.16. Is this f(u)du? I would have thought it would have to be only f(u) but it does not get through in the text for me which function they mean

The text is also here in page 162-163 in the link to the whole book:

http://bildr.no/view/1099870

(sometimes some pages does not load but if one open it in different readers for the internet one get different pages unavailable each time. But the part of the book with the text that I wonder about is in the link in the beginning anyway)
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
georg gill said:
http://bildr.no/view/1099870

The distribution of velocities of particles in this text is given by f(u) later in the text (the final part) they say that f(u) du gives fraction of gas molecules with speed between u and du+u. I thought that would only give a infinite small number since du is infinite small and not a fraction of the molecules?

And I also wonder about that in the next sentence they refer to a function that is drawn in figure 5.15 and 5.16. Is this f(u)du? I would have thought it would have to be only f(u) but it does not get through in the text for me which function they mean

The text is also here in page 162-163 in the link to the whole book:

http://bildr.no/view/1099870

(sometimes some pages does not load but if one open it in different readers for the internet one get different pages unavailable each time. But the part of the book with the text that I wonder about is in the link in the beginning anyway)

sorry wrong second link don't think it is that important the question is given in the first anyway

http://books.google.no/books?id=2Ox...Q-oGrDg&ved=0CEQQ6AEwBDgK#v=onepage&q&f=false
 
georg gill said:
http://bildr.no/view/1099870

The distribution of velocities of particles in this text is given by f(u) later in the text (the final part) they say that f(u) du gives fraction of gas molecules with speed between u and du+u. I thought that would only give a infinite small number since du is infinite small and not a fraction of the molecules?

An infinitely small fraction is still a fraction of the molecules. More importantly, integrating f(u) du from a to b gives you the fraction of molecules with velocities between a and b.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top