Numerical Facts about the Milky way's halo

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of determining the density, scale radius, and normal radius of the Milky Way's halo for use in the NFW profile. It highlights that the scale density is not a definitive numerical fact due to its degeneracy with the scale radius, meaning multiple pairs of values can fit the data. The conversation suggests that expressing halo profiles in terms of v_max may provide clearer insights than relying solely on rho_0. A proposed halo model with constants is shared, along with a reference to a relevant paper for further details. Overall, the complexity of halo modeling is emphasized, particularly in the context of the NFW profile.
majormuss
Messages
124
Reaction score
4
I am trying to find the density, scale radius and normal radius of the milky way's halo. But these things are pretty hard to find. I want to find them so I can input them into the NFW profile:
760e366561387be89639a1aab92a56b0.png
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
In this thread I gave some constants of a proposed halo model as well as a link to a paper with more detail.
 
This may be a nitpick (depending on what you are trying to achieve) but the scale density is not a "numerical fact" because it is degenerate with the scale radius when you express the NFW profile as you have done. For any set of data there is a range of pairs of values rho_0 and R_s that all fit well enough, so you can't say any particular value of rho_0 is a "fact". Its often better with these halo profiles to express them in terms of v_max instead of rho_0.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top