Numerical Methods - Newton Raphson

hotvette
Homework Helper
Messages
1,001
Reaction score
11
The following 2 page example illustrates the use of the Newton-Raphson technique for solving for roots of functions. Examples included:

1. Function in a single variable
2. System of non-linear equations
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nicely formatted... great examples too; interesting to finally find something on its use with non-linear systems. :)
Thanks!
 
Thanks for the nice comments. My objective is to make things clear, concise, and practical. I need to see examples to understand things, so I figured others do also.:cool:
 
Division using Newton-Raphson. :smile:

We want to compute 1/y for some number y. This amounts to solving the equation:

<br /> \frac{1}{x} - y = 0<br />

for x. If we do that using Newton-Raphson, we get:

<br /> x_{n+1} = 2x_{n} - x_{n}^{2}y<br />

This is indeed a true division algorithm as it doesn't contain any divisions. Also, due to quadratic convergence, you double the number of significant digits at each step. Long division will only yield one significant digit per step.

The above algorithm can also be used to compute the Taylor series of a function 1/f(x) if the Taylor series of f(x) is known. You just take P_{0}(x) to be the first term of the expansion, e.g. if f(0) is nonzero then P_{0}=1/f(0) and you iterate using the algorithm:

<br /> P_{n+1}(x) = 2P_{n}(x) - P_{n}(x)^{2}f(x)<br />

At each step the number of correct terms will double, so P_{n}(x) will contain the first 2^{n} terms of the series expansion of 1/f(x). Note that this means that the term P_{n}(x)^{2}f(x) has to be computed to order \mathcal{O}\left(x^{2^{n+1}-1}\right).

So, computing the first billion terms of 1/f(x) only requires 30 iterations :smile: But we can do much more than computing reciprocals. Computing the series expansion of \log(f(x)) is almost as easy as computing the reciprocal of f(x) as all you have to do is integrate f&#039;(x)/f(x) term by term. And using this algorithm for \log(f(x)) you can also compute \exp\left(f(x)\right) using Newton-Raphson to solve for that function that yields f(x) after taking the logarithm using Newton-Raphson and the algorithm for computing the logarithm of a series expansion.

Since a large class of functions can be expressed in terms of logarithms and exponentials, the series expansion of pretty much any awkward function can be computed this way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top